Is a New American Reichstag in the Works?

By Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
August 17, 2011

That is what chatter coming from the United States government seems to suggest. A few weeks ago, we reported on how a video from the Department of Homeland Security(DHS) incited fear of ‘white Al-Qaeda’ terrorists and just a day after publication, Anders Breivik blew up a government building in Oslo, Norway.

The U.S. government is preaching the idea that a new Oklahoma City style attack is coming.

Since Oslo, the very same Department of Homeland Security has put out a new Public Service Announcement where they go at it again. The white American is the threat. Somehow the U.S. Government found a way to move the threat from Islamic fundamentalists to Americans who support Constitutionalism.

In the new ad, DHS presents new ‘white faces’ while calling for a high state of vigilance from the part of the citizenry to report any ‘suspicious’ or ‘out of the ordinary’ activity. As in previous occasions, no clear definition of ‘suspicious’ or ‘out of the ordinary’ is given. This technique, as we reported before, is a psychological operation to instigate fear and distrust on the public so that they not only accept the government’s message of fear, but also turn against their neighbors and family members and tattle tale about their questioning of government policies.

Back in the days of the infamous Nazi party, Adolf Hitler used the false threat of a foreign force planning to attack Germany in order to push the public to accept his insane power grab, that ended in the death of Jews, Christians, and any other members of groups that opposed his policies. Hitler only failed on his attempt to take over Europe and the world, because his handlers had already achieved their goal to ramp up the war movement by playing Hitler against other military forces.

The threat of a ‘lone wolf’ style terror attack in the United States then is the solution to save the drastically faded Obama presidency. If you think this is insane, take a look at this article on the Financial Times of London, where Robert Shapiro, a former White House aide to Bill Clinton suggested that barring a terror attack, the Obama administration was doomed. We must add to this Barack Obama’s own assessment which included his thought that the United States could absorb another terror attack of the size of 9/11.

Yesterday, Barack Obama came out to reinforce even more the supposed threat of homegrown terrorism during an interview on CNN. While responding to a comment from Wolf Blitzer, Obama identified the possibility that a single person could cause a major terror attack. “We are vigilant and constantly monitoring the threat of a terrorist attack… The risk is always there… The risk we are concerned now is the ‘lone wolf’ threat, a single person with a weapon, someone being able to carry out the type of massacre we saw in Norway recently.” Of course, it has been proven that Anders Breivik did not act alone. In fact, even main stream media reports confirm that Breivik called police several times to turn himself in before the attacks.

A couple of days ago, New York Times writer Paul Krugman came out and suggested the United States would benefit greatly if a new threat such as the invasion of aliens happened because it would allow the government to launch wars and therefore revive the economy. This train of thought would be funny if it wasn’t because what Krugman suggested was exactly the agenda carried out in World Wars I and II. Upon the evident economic crisis, the Globalists decided to play nations against nations in order to spur manufacturing of war machinery, create jobs within the military industrial complex and start fresh again after the wars were over. But at what human cost?

What does the new DHS Ad say?

Picking up where they left off a few weeks ago, the Department of Homeland Security headed by Secretary Janet Napolitano, continues its fear mongering campaign to get people to accept the next big terrorist attack and the Police State measures that will stem from it.

In the video, DHS shows a white young man driving a cab. He stops by what seems to be a bus or train station, opens the trunk of the cab and activates what appears to be an explosive device. At the same time, two passengers inside the station see a suspicious looking woman walking inside the station as she flies by them. And guess what, she’s white, too. A white man who observes the white taxi driver walking away from the cab is then shown talking to a police officer in a supposed attempt to denounce the suspicious activity.

What can we get from this? When looked at it in more than one dimension, it is clear that once again the DHS intends to portray whites as dangerous, especially white middle class people. In order to understand this trick, one needs to connect the ad to the current financial situation, where mostly middle class and the poor (taxi drivers and public transportation users) are being robbed of their future. Everywhere in the world, it is the middle and poor class the ones rising up against the Globalist attempt to further consolidate economic and military power. After Anders Breivik allegedly attacked the federal building in Oslo, authorities beefed up security in the capital and other cities in Norway. After the last riots in London, in another Problem, Reaction, Solution scheme, a crowd of criminals attacked local businesses and homes. The British government decided to use face recognition technology on the streets to scan and store imagery from anyone who “may be or act suspicious”. Previous to the attacks, police stood down and let the looters do whatever they wanted and now they want to scan everyone’s faces.

Back in the United States the corporate prostitute media continues to eco Obama’s speech about the threat of a ‘lone wolf’ attack. On Tuesday, CBS News said the next attack would not come from Islamic terrorists, but from a member of the “Sovereign Citizen” movement in the United States, that is everyone calling for the end of the Federal Reserve, the end of the wars, the reactivation of the economy, the adoption of sound fiscal and monetary policies and the end of interventionism and empire building. Going by the recent polls, this group of people now labeled as “dangerous” by the federal government, includes a powerful minority who is armed and ready to defend their rights to speak freely, own and carry weapons to protect themselves and their families from rising crime, public protest against insane government policies and anyone who supports Ron Paul and anyone and anything that smells like Constitutionalism.

Naturally, the government knows that it does not take a majority to get the government back to the people, but a really well-educated and armed minority to eject the current invaders who occupy the United States of America, or for that matter every other country in the western world. That is why the government continues to move initiatives to discretely ban the second amendment carrying out stings in gun shows and invading private property to look for legally held fire arms. Obama himself is an “in the closet” gun grabber. So are Rick Perry and Mitt Romney. In April, the newspaper the Star-Tribune reported that the Federal Bureau of Investigation is spying on citizens in Wyoming to keep tabs on their use of fire arms. FBI agent Kathy Wright said that “the bureau has kept an eye on the movement because some sovereigns have taken the logical step from belief in the illegitimacy of the current system to acting violently against it.”

What could come from a situation where a disarmed society is unable to protect itself from crime and the abuses of government? Ask relatives of people who survived the Nazi atrocities, ask the people of Oklahoma City, the people from Virginia Tech, from New York, and more recently from Norway. What could stem from an educated society that freely carries fire arms to defend itself? Ask the citizens of Switzerland and Texas.

Can we believe anything Breivik says?

by Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
July 25, 2011

Anders Behring Breivik

Is Anders Behring Breivik, the alleged terrorist who blew up a government building in Oslo, Norway a reliable source for the public to learn why and how he carried out the attack? His acquaintance and co-worker, Ulav Andersson, says he may have been brainwashed.

Kim Heger, the Norwegian judge seeing the case, has determined that Breivik must remain hidden in a cell under solitary confinement, away from everyone and everything. Official statements from Norwegian justice say that the supposed bomber has confessed to working with two other cells, and the judge has given him 8 weeks of detention while more details surface.

According to Reuters, the suspect confessed to using bombs and participating in the shootings, but did not admit guilt. However, the court has denied requests to elaborate on Breivik’s claims that he worked with two other cells or organizations and any extra details of the plot, where the cells are located, possible members, where he got to be part of the cells and so on.

There are some questions one can raise about Anders Behring Breivik and his recent past that could help clarify the reasons for him allegedly participating in the attacks. For example, sas he seeing a Psychiatrist recently? Was he taking any medication, such as psychotropics? Who was he in contact with, friends, associates etc… in the days, weeks and months before the attacks? Did he travel to foreign countries in the recent past? Was he enlisted to participate or did he participated in Norway’s mandatory military service? What was he trained in: military intelligence?

As we reported last night, Oslo’s and Utoya’s attacks have very serious tones of a false-flag attack, however it will not be until the above posed questions are answered that we will be able to definitely say whether it is or not. The fact that Breivik acted alone or otherwise as part of a cell, does not tell much about whether he is a patsy or not. What is strange as the news continue to develop, is that Norwegian authorities are being sketchy about the information they put out. If they believe people should know Breivik confessed to participating in the attacks, shouldn’t the public also be awarded elaborated reports about what he has told police?

The practice of skimming information and feeding only little bits of it could be seen as a tactic by police not to interrupt or cause harm to their investigation, but if they already have the alleged bomber confessing to the crime, what else is there to know? Would not Breivik provide all the information police needs to continue their work? On the other hand, and given recent history, it is more likely that authorities prefer not to reveal details because they may have to come out and correct parts that do not make sense in order to keep people unaware of the real facts. It is much easier to control information when there is only one person making public statements about this terrorist attack than when there are 2 or 3.

In any case, what credibility does any statement from Breivik has as he has already changed his story twice in three days? If he was brainwashed as Andersson suggested, there is even less credibility on anything he says.  “The accused has made statements today that require further investigation, including that ‘there are two more cells in our organization,” judge Heger said during a news conference.

UPDATE (25 JULY 1, 35 PM):

Norwegian authorities now say the death toll is lower than what was published prematurely. A total of 76 individuals and NOT 92.

Oslo Terror Attack has False-flag Tones

by Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
July 24, 2011

As the Real Agenda warned on Thursday, the likelihood of a false-flag terror attack was ever more possible than in the last few years. In our article published on Thursday July 21, we focused attention on a new video put out by the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA in the United States which specifically pointed to white or caucasian males as potential threats for terrorism. In the video, both organizations portrayed white men dropping off car bombs in a federal building and activating explosives on a street somewhere.

What are the chances that the very next day, a supposed white terrorist attacked a government building in Oslo, Norway? What are the chances that the alleged bomber used one of the two methods showed in the Homeland Security video? What are the chances that it was a white male with Christian Conservative beliefs?

One only needs to take a look at the history and the main traits that past terrorist attacks had and compare them to the bomb attack in Oslo, but that could have occurred anywhere else in the world. First of all, the main stream media rapidly came out blaming muslim extremists for the attack to later change their story and blame “white” Al-Qaeda for the attacks in Oslo and Utoya.

Another part that coincides with other false-flag attacks is that the supposed perpetrator is presented as acting alone, and when the fake public relations media stories fail to convince the public, new details are added to make the story live for another day. Now, police say they have a second man in custody who supposedly acted together with Anders Behring Breivik to carry out both attacks. The same lone patsy scheme was offered by authorities during the Oklahoma City bombing and the World Trade Center attack in 1993.

Another piece of information that does not make sense is that the terrorist attack happened on a holiday, when most government workers were not at their desks. Why would a terrorist take the time and work to carry out an attack and make it happen during a holiday? Why would a terrorist group attack a mostly empty building on a holiday? Oslo’s bomb blast comes in times of economic hardship in Europe while the government is experiencing low levels of approval from the public and after Norway announced the withdrawal of its troops from the NATO force that is bombing Libya and other countries in Africa.

Anders Behring Breivik is a white caucasian of 32 years of age, who calls himself a Christian Conservative and as some reports rumor, a Freemason. Nothing against freemasons here. No way though, a “lone wolf” killed 92 people in Norway. In fact, another man has been apprehended. Is the information posted on Breivik’s Facebook page an attempt to frame Christian Conservatives to later label them as potential terrorists? That is a very likely scenario, because that is what governments did with muslims after 9/11. See Anders Behring Breivik´s Facebook page here.

To all this we have to add that police delayed any action in the island of Utoya for 90 minutes. That allowed the shooter there to carry out its plan to shoot everyone who he found while the police arrived. During 9/11, fighting jets were also delayed by at least one hour which allowed the planes to make their way to New York City. The dying dinosaur main stream media blamed Muslims for Norway’s attack with zero evidence and also blamed “white” Al-Qaeda, again, with no proof of it.

Given the fact that Norway’s Prime Minister was supposed to meet and talk to the youngsters in Utoya, it makes it too convenient that the bomb in the government building was a well placed distraction to help the shooters in Utoya carry out the killings. Another convenient fact is that Anders Behring Breivik was supposedly a farmer. He was seen buying six tons of fertilizer before the massacre, his supplier said Saturday. The shooting started just hours after the explosion that destroyed the government building in Oslo where the prime minister’s office was located.

According to historian and researcher Webster G. Tarpley, the terror attack in Oslo has “telltale signs of a false flag provocation”.

It is reported that, although the world media are attempting to focus on Anders Behring Breivik as a lone assassin in the tradition of Lee Harvey Oswald, many eyewitnesses agree that a second shooter was active in the massacre at the Utøya summer youth camp outside of Oslo. It has also come to light that a special police unit had been conducting a drill or exercise in downtown Oslo which involved the detonation of bombs – exactly what caused the bloodshed a few hundred meters away little more than 48 hours later. Further research reveals that United States intelligence agencies had been conducting a large-scale program of recruiting retired Norwegian police officers with the alleged purpose of conducting surveillance inside the country. This program, known as SIMAS Surveillance Detection Units, provided a perfect vehicle for the penetration and subversion of the Norwegian police by NATO. “

According to Norwegian media, several drills were conducted in the days before the attacks in Oslo, with men in black suits climbing down the walls of buildings downtown Oslo, just a few hundred meters from the prime minister’s office. This behaviour matches actions carried out in previous false-flag attacks such as the one on September 11, 2001. What government drills allow for is the collocation of explosives or car bombs -which may be part of the drill- and that in theory are fake explosives and fake car bombs, but that in reality are real explosives and real car bombs. Those who participate in the drills may or may not know about the real explosives or bombs, because the equipment and materials used during such drills are most often than not “real world” ones. The fact that drills occurred also protect those who may be to blame for the attack because “everything was part of the drill” and no one knew there were real explosives or real car bombs involved.

Another trait that makes the bomb blast in Oslo strange is that an acquaintance of Anders Behring Breivik, Ulav Andersson, says he may have been brainwashed. Anderson was also Breivik’s co-worker.

Breivik also attended Knight’s Templar meetings and as we reported before, he seems to also be a Freemason. The only thing that has not happened in Oslo’s terror attack is that Breivik has not been mysteriously murdered in prison or hung himself in his cell as it happened in other cases. But new developments will be unfolding in the following days and this outcome would not be a surprise.

While all this information is out there clearly pointing to false-flag attack, the main stream media and their security and terrorism experts choose to ignore them and go blame the Christian Conservative extremists.

NO Rights for Terrorists!

By Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
May 5, 2010

So I have been thinking, with all this terror that exists today around the world, where mindless idiots blow themselves up in order torights avenge their countries and fight our freedoms in the western world, we should all be worried.  So, does the government say.  Reading through government papers and documents like the MIAC report, the Patriot Act and listening to talking heads on television, and politicians from 7 developed nations in the world, I began to wonder.  Who do we need to be afraid off and why?

The threat of terrorism as portrayed by the oppressor governments does not exist.  There aren’t terrorists out there who want to kill us for our freedoms.  White Al-Qaeda does not exist either.  The Tea Party is not a racist movement.  The militias are not anarchists as Homeland Security says.  Libertarians, Ron Paul followers, Tea Partiers, WeAreChange and other people like that are not violent as the Main Stream Media preaches.  As we found out today, the Hutaree Militia was released with bond, because the judge said their right to free speech cannot be violated, and also because there was not any proof that they were planning to attack the government.  The whole war on terror is a sham, to suppress our civil liberties, rights and even our duties.  Instead of closing the borders, effectively inspecting cargos and protecting us at home, the governments simply decides to fight a war against an invisible enemy, an enemy that can exist forever.

That is why the government itself plans and executes false-flag attacks, in order to keep the boogie-man alive.  And when one boogie-man goes away, a new one comes alive.  The only time when groups of citizens commit violent events is when they are incited by government infiltrators.  The recent Times Square incident where a Nissan was supposedly holding a bomb was all a lie that the media gladly hyped.  How do I know that?  Well, if one studies the history of terrorism, it is clear that terrorists always want to get attention from the government and the media.  So what a better way to get that attention than perpetrating attacks on civilians or civilian targets?  That is why when the government orchestrates attacks, they are greatly exaggerated at first, and then quietly labeled as misunderstandings.  That is why when a supposed attack happens, citizens are immediately labeled as responsible, (Tea Party members) but then quietly dismissed as non guilty.  It occurred with the Hutaree Militia, Joe Stack, some of the 9/11 hijackers, and countless other citizens who are first accused of violating laws, but then released because there is nothing to prove the claims.

Previous to 9/11, the United States, Spain, Ireland and other countries used to give the least amount of air time and importance to real terrorist attacks exactly for the same reason mentioned above: All the terrorists want is attention in order to get what they demand.  But after 9/11, suddenly everything is terrorism and everyone is a terrorist.  However, the real terrorists are easily let in, flown in and out with the help of intelligence agencies (the underwear bomber was let on the plane by an intelligence officer).

So who do we need to fear?  Let’s review.  The governments have decided they have the power -although we did not give it to them- to label anyone they wish as a terrorist.  This means you, me or anyone we know can be called a terrorist and be accused of terrorism or of  inciting it, get stripped of rights such as due process, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and so on.  As if that was not enough, today I read on the press that the government intends to take away the rights of those citizens who are found to be terrorists.  And who has the prerogative to decide a person is a terrorist?  The government.

Flip-flopper Joe Lieberman has been pushing this idea for a while, but it now seems to be picking up more steam than before due to the false-flag terror attempt in New York City.  Lieberman has championed the causes of the government for the past 9 years and now he is proposing to rid us of our rights if he or Obama or Homeland Security believes we belong to a terrorist group.  “If you’re attacking your fellow Americans in an act of war you lose the rights that come with citizenship,” Lieberman told reporters.  That is right.  Not only has the government the power to call you a terrorist, detain you indefinitely, torture you, and make you disappear.  Now, Mr. flip-flopper wants to rape the Constitution and simply turn citizens into what would I say… Prisoners of war?

According to the Raw Story, Lieberman stated that “any individual apprehended, American citizen, who is found to be involved with a foreign terrorist organization as designated by the Department of State, would be deprived of their citizenship rights.”  Again, who has the power to designate a citizen a terrorist?  That is right, the government.  Do you see where my concern comes from?  “If you have joined an enemy of the United States in attacking the United States to try to kill Americans I think you sacrifice your rights of citizenship,” said Lieberman.

In a separate event, Barack Hussein Obama spoke at a commencement and arrogantly warned the audience and those who watched the event to stop criticizing the government, especially his Health Care Reform.  This criticism, he said, is not kosher because ‘we are all the government’ and in a Democracy, if we criticize the government we impair ourselves.  How about that?  Mr. Obama forgot two things.  First, the U.S. is not a Democracy, and second, that in a free Republic, the rights of the people such as freedom of speech, come first.  If we think the government is doing a bad job, we say it!  Neither will Obama’s warnings nor Lieberman’s attacks on citizens will deter our right to denounce the government, the corporations that control it or the existence of false-flag terrorist attacks.  You can take that to the bank!