UN Sterilization Campaigns In Developing Countries Accelerating


The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.”

From a MIT lecture by professor Penny Chisholm.

For over half a century demographers at the United Nations have attempted to “convince” people from both developing and developed nations to limit their households to one child. In the decades after WW2 no means were spared in order to get this message across. Radio, television, newspapers were cleverly used to reach people in the remotest areas. By the mid-seventies, all available instruments of propaganda were strategically set in motion, with taxpayer’s money to spare and lots of “human resources” to scale back (as social engineers prefer to call us). The justification that could be given to the Western middle class was wonderfully simple: under the guise of developing the undeveloped, the UN sold its Third World population agenda. Simultaneously the developing nations were propagandized into surrendering their people’s birthright to procreate and multiply- two things our species is prone to do. All those resisting the onslaught of information were characterized as a scourge on the environment. Because the eugenicists have an enemy that is not easily defeated, namely human instinct and dignity, it was crucial to discredit human nature first, making it suspect, while replacing human nature with an artificially created “shadow nature” which readily rejects notions such as life and liberty, embracing covert eugenics and tyranny instead. Although the UN in the west has learned to speak of “sustainable development” when speaking of population control, their language in developing countries has been more crude, more closely resembling the original eugenic tongue on how best to keep their populations in check.

Despite all these efforts the overall human population has increased. The UN began to grow restless and less impressed with its own propaganda efforts. In the West populations may have decreased, in the developing world they increased all the more. More drastic measures began to be proposed for the Third World with the aim of speeding up the population agenda. From the beginning of this century onwards all kinds of horror-stories began dripping in, describing among other things state-sponsored sterilization policies in the Third World.


In 2010, the British Independent featured an AP article detailing suspicions that health officials in the Republic of Uzbekistan are widely involved in involuntary sterilization-practices.

The AP-reporter spoke with a 24-year old housewife named Saodat Rakhimbayeva, an extremely brave woman who tells a heart-wrenching tale of state-sponsored eugenics in her home country of Uzbekistan. After giving birth to a premature boy, she had to witness her son dying just three days later.

“Then”, states the article, “came a further devastating blow: She learned that the surgeon had removed part of her uterus during the operation, making her sterile.”

“According to rights groups, victims and health officials, Rakhimbayeva is one of hundreds of Uzbek women who have been surgically sterilized without their knowledge or consent in a program designed to prevent overpopulation from fueling unrest.(…). The order comes from the very top,” said Khaitboy Yakubov, head of the Najot human rights group in Uzbekistan.”

This statement by Yakubov has more significance that he himself probably realizes. By “the very top” he likely refers to the central Uzbek government. As it turns out, the order came from even higher up.

An official communiqué from the embassy of Uzbekistan in New Delhi gives us more insight in a remarkable initiative by the Uzbek state and the different partners with which it collaborates:

“The complex of measures for the “Mother’s and Child’s Screening”, directed to prevent the childbirth with the hereditary diseases, accompanying with intellectual backwardness as well as inspection of pregnant women is carried out in the Republic with the purpose of revealing anomalies of development of a child-bearing. (…). Within the framework of the State Programs the cooperation is continuing with the WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, USAID, JICA, KfW Bank, World Bank, Asian Development Bank (…).”

The United Nations Population Fund concurs. It admits helping Uzbek authorities screen its citizens:

“In Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan, UNFPA worked to strengthen national capacities to collect, analyze and disseminate gender disaggregated data on population, development and reproductive health and to integrate population variables and gender concerns into development and environmental planning.”

Now what this really mean? A Japanese International Corporation Agency, profiling Uzbekistan’s disability policies, states the following in regards to the Uzbek national screening program (page 11):

“By 2001, 124.000 of new-borns had been examined, 2.800 children in at-risk groups had been identified; and 160 had been registered in health clinics. For genetic reasons, 1.381 pregnancies were terminated.”

Furthermore, an Uzbek government-website acknowledges receiving generous funding for its eugenic programs and restates the UN-funded mission:

“Up-to-date medical technologies help detect possible defects in the development of a fetus at an early stage of pregnancy. To preclude birth of children with genetic disease accompanied by mental abnormalities and to detect fetus abnormality (…).”

Another Uzbek government website gave a description of the ultimate goal of the “Mother and Child screening” program as follows:

“(…) reducing the birth of disabled children.”

In the same publication, the above-mentioned “screening” of possible “intellectual backwardness” serves to “prevent childbirth with hereditary diseases”.

Interestingly the link to that webpage is now dead. However they can not erase away the fact that these practises constitute eugenics in its purest form. And transnational organizations like the UN, World Bank and the German KfW Bank are directly and fanatically involved in the funding of these “screening”-programs conducted by Uzbek health authorities.

The UN itself admits in its own publications to its “long-standing partnership and track-record working in Uzbekistan.”:

“The UN’s mandate in supporting the implementation and monitoring of the MDGs (UN Millennium Development Goals) at the country level is a substantial comparative advantage in assisting the Government (of Uzbekistan) to enhance living standards, and achieve higher levels of human development. As a credible and trusted partner of the Government, we provide policy advice, technical assistance and programmatic support, drawing on best global practices.”

An important item of the UN’s “programmatic support” is their ideas on population-screening and control, making sure that Uzbek women:

“… have access, as and when they require, to what we call reproductive health.- family planning, contraception, and medical care during pregnancy, at delivery and afterwards.”

In a publication by USAID, the largest US aid institution paid for by US tax dollars, reference was made to the contributions of the United Nations Population Fund:

“UNFPA provided IUD’s, injectables and pills. Health facilities hold at least 3 different methods, though their quantities are not sufficient.”

In regards to USAID’s own contributions, which include training local Uzbek health officials, the document lists a training-course:

“The two week-training included theory and extensive practise. Each participant passing the course received a set of instruments for minilaporotomy. During training courses 39 clients were sterilized. 88 clients have been sterilized by trained providers to date.”

Another USAID-document from 1993 recommends some actions to be taken in regards to Central European nations, such as Uzbekistan (page 10):

“New contraceptive technologies should be offered, with training in their application and in the counseling of clients on the choices available to them. Policy change will be required in some countries to permit sterilization to be included among available options for both women and men. To assure the commitment of health sector leadership, study tours in the united States would be useful, as would inclusion of the heads of medical training institutions in the redesign of medical and nursing curricula to integrate family planning into health care.”

Remember the reports from the Uzbek woman reporting involuntary sterilization practices by Uzbek doctors. It seems it is being done with US taxpayer dollars, and with additional donations from the World Bank, German development bank, the United Nations Population Fund- and let’s not leave out another important contributor, the World Health Organization. The WHO reports on their own website:

“Uzbekistan and WHO: A close relationship exists between WHO and the Ministry of Health (MOH).”

Listed under “Opportunities”, the WHO mentions that:

“Uzbekistan now receives substantial funding for health programmes with contributions from many key partners.”


According to a report out of India earlier this year, several victims of forced sterilization by state officials have come forward, providing bone-chilling evidence of widespread sterilization practices in Madhya Pradesh, a huge province in India’s heartland. An item carried by India Today, under the header “conned into sterilization” features no less than 8 victims of Indian government officials, who routinely round up citizens and sterilize them just to meet the state’s family planning targets. As it turns out, it’s not just the state’s targets they are meeting. Every time some chicken-necked eugenicist grabs a surgical knife, it is the desires of the UN and World Health Organization he’s satisfying.

The victims interviewed include a 98-year old man and an 80-year old man, both of whom were forced to undergo vasectomy. Government officials threatened the men with withholding their social benefits if they refused.

“While these men got to live the life they wanted till a ripe old age, 24-year old Jamuna Kori of Sidhi district was not so lucky. One day, he was just picked up from a road by two men, sterilised and left on the highway again.”

The article, written by correspondent Rahul Singh, also features a woman who was drugged into submission:

“They gave me something to drink and I fell unconscious. When I woke up I realized they had operated on me. I want an inquiry”.

The video also shows several mentally challenged individuals, who were not even threatened but just directly operated upon.

The clip also features a 25 year old man who took his 2 year old son for an anti-rabies vaccine after the boy was bitten by a dog. The doctors told the man they would only treat his son if the father would undergo sterilization. The Telegraph carried an article recently about this case, in which the young father said:

“My son’s life was more important. I was told private hospitals charge 900 Rupees (£11) for each injection,” he told The Indian Express.”

“In 2010”, states a 2011 article out of New Delhi, “Madhya Pradesh achieved a record sterilization target of 645,000, luring villagers with freebies such as mobile phones, two-wheelers and gold coins to undergo sterilization.”

But now, in 2012, it seems the eugenicists in the UN are loosing patience as now they just order people picked up from the road to have them drugged and sterilized.

In an ad put out by the UNFPA (the United Nations Population Fund) for the job of family planning consultant (7 vacancies) the candidates are being informed about the reasons for more hands:

“Given that the presence of the private sector is marginal, there is major client load on the public health system. Hence, if sterilization services in Madhya Pradesh have to pick up, public health system has to gear itself and other options of public–private partnership, wherever feasible, will have to be explored.”

Another piece of evidence that the sterilisation-efforts contributed to the state is actually being coordinated by the UNFPA:

“It is proposed to have a dedicated technical person in the office of divisional joint director, as divisional family planning consultant, supported by UNFPA. The consultant would be physically located in the office of divisional joint director health services and will work under direct administrative and technical control of joint director health services.”

In fact, these practices are being conducted worldwide- always with the help of the same old modus operandi: the World Bank and their UN partners constrict sovereign nations to the point of them accepting trading-“privileges”. In order to safeguard a seat around the transnational table, these nations- often struggling with widespread poverty- accept every and any condition by the lender of last resort (IMF, World Bank). These conditions are far from secret. They are actually right out in the open. This latest Indian horror story is further evidence of the fact that not the Indian state is the initiator of these forced sterilization policies, as the article by Rahul Singh argues. It is the UNFPA rather, the enforcement arm of the eugenicists, which both sets the standards, provides the technology, recruits the medical personnel, and- on a global level- enforces these sterilization policies through binding treaties and other supranational strangleholds.

In the context of the 2011 UN’s World Population Day several developing nations were quick to pledge allegiance to the eugenic deity. In the east-Indian state of Bihar, officials put out the announcement that:

“The Bihar government will soon formulate a new population control policy. The policy will be framed in collaboration with the United Nations Population Fund (UNPF).”

Another Indian state, Karnataka, had President Gladys Almeida “observe World Population Day” at which event she told local government employees:

“There is a need to create an awareness on the need for population control.”

Another individual present said:

“as the population increases, nature takes its own method to control it.”

Another compliant nation, Pakistan, had their Federal Minister for Population Welfare Firdous Aashiq Awan announce that:

“The government is taking serious measures to control population growth in the country.”

The government in Islmabad even recruits religious leaders (a trick stolen from the UN) in order to sell population control to the masses:

“(…) religious leaders are being empowered. For the first time, ‘Imam Masjid’ is being made a partner in population Welfare programmes. He would act as a social mobilizer, she (Awan) added.”

These pledges of allegiance to the UN and their set goals of reducing human numbers are not exclusively made by developing countries. Developed countries have accustomed themselves with the same line of reasoning. The only difference is that, as of yet, the language has been more “friendly”, masking the true purpose of the scientific dictatorship implemented.


Via news outlet the Global Times, the Chinese State in 2010 lamented the “issue of unauthorized births” in light of the UN’s stated goal of “efficient population control.”

The UN’s World population Day, July 11, was originally set up in 1989 by the Governing Council of the United Nations Development Programma to “raise awareness of global population issues.”

“The theme of this year’s (2010) 21st World Population Day”, mentions the article, “is “Everyone Counts”, and the activities in China will focus on the 2010 population census and emphasize the right to life.”

“In China”, the article goes on to say, “the issue of unauthorized births is at the forefront of its efforts to control the growth of its population as it undermines the country’s family planning policy, or “one-child policy”, which was implemented in 1980.”

“According to Chinese statistics, the national population reached 1.3 billion at the end of 2008, with 6.7 million born that year. Unauthorized births accounted for a large percentage of those births.”

“Since the family planning policy was implemented, local governments strictly controlled the births of each family, and allowed each couple to have one child, but with a more flexible policy in China’s ethnic minority areas. However, not all couples obeyed the rules (…).”

Besides the horrible “obeyed the rules”, the bone chilling term “unauthorized births” is used several times in the article to describe families exceeding their allowance of babies they decide to put on this earth. As we know, having more than one baby provokes direct interference from the Chinese State, which can tax, fine, threaten and even terminate the new life considered by the all-powerful state to be a burden on the environment. The article also mentions the existence of a “household contract responsibility system”- created nationwide to make sure the population control policies would be strictly carried out. Such a slave-state is exactly what the UN envisions for their desired world government. Although the UN itself tempers the tongue when it comes to their stated goal of reducing the world’s population, the Chinese authorities know exactly what goals the UN expects them to pursue:

“It (the UN) also aims to stress the importance of efficient population control by means of collecting and analyzing the latest data so as to make an impact on decision-making and improve people’s lives.”

A statement written for World Population Day by the Secretary-General of the UN reads as follows:

“On this World Population Day, I call on decision-makers everywhere to make each and every person count. Only by considering the needs of all women and men,girls and boys,can we achieve the Millennium Development Goals and advance the shared values of the United Nations.”

These shared values were described in detail by UN’s Agenda 21:

“(…) a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced: a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.”

The stifling silence that envelops this subject in developed nations, will only make it easier for the UN to go ahead with their population policies in developing ones. And to anyone in the West who thinks strict population policies in the Third World are sad but necessary, I would like to point out that under a global government, or “global governance” as the UN prefers to say, developed and developing nations alike are subject to its decrees. So every time we wave these facts away like an irritating fly, be assured it will come back to haunt us.


Why Use the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine?

By Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
September 2, 2011

According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Human Papillomavirus does not cause cervical cancer. This leads me to think and ask, why a woman would be injected with the vaccine that supposedly fights the HPV? Also, why a mother or responsible person would let his 9 year old daughter to be injected with this vaccine?

In Mexico health authorities plan to inject the HPV vaccine on all the girls from next year on, said the Health  Minister on Tuesday.

Beginning in 2012, the HPV vaccine will be included in the cocktail of injections administered to all girls age 9 and above, said Health Minister Jose Angel Cordova.

Ironically, the minister revealed that deaths from cervical cancer have declined by 47 percent in Mexico over the past two decades. This is a significant number. So why do they want to vaccinate children” Well, according to Cordova, there were still 13.4 cases per 100,000 women last year.

The decision to inject indiscriminately all children is viewed with confusion due to the fact that the virus does not cause cervical cancer and on top of this it is eliminated naturally by the body with the help of good nutrition and a healthy immune system. But Mexican authorities want to make the HPV vaccine universal, according to them, to reduce mortality from this cancer by 50 percent in women over 25 years of age.

HPV is sexually transmitted and often the body can eliminate it by itself without the aid of vaccines or pharmaceuticals, cites a report by Agence France Press. However, in some cases the infection remains and can eventually lead to cervical cancer.

Strains 16 and 18 represent 70 percent of cervical cancer cases worldwide, which number about 500,000 a year, according to the Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA).

Although these numbers seem alarming, and they should be for those who become could potentially become ill with cervical cancer, the American Medical Association (AMA) says: “There is significant evidence to indicate that there is no benefit from the vaccine. The disappearance of the virus during periods of 12 months is not related to the use of the vaccine. It is unlikely that vaccination has any significant benefit.”

Why then Mexico or any other country would use the HPV vaccine and would seek to injected on all girls and women? The fact that the virus does not cause cervical cancer and the vaccine is ineffective in treating it needs to be added to another finding: the vaccine only protects against two or three strains from a total of more than 100. All this without counting the more than 3500 serious side effects that the vaccine has been shown to cause in many patients who have been injected.

Persistent infection with HPV, not the human papillomavirus itself, is what promotes or causes precancerous lesions and cancer. But if the vaccine does not treat or eliminate the virus, what good does it do? On the other hand, according to the FDA, the HPV vaccine in women who have human papillomavirus increases the risk of cervical cancer by 44.6%, because this vaccine promotes the development of precancerous lesions in the uterus, which eventually leads to cervical cancer.

The falsity of the effectiveness of the vaccine to prevent cancer should be added to the fact that medical practices used today to assess cervical health do not examine whether a woman has cervical cancer. The exams only test for the presence of the HPV. Finally, we must say that most infections are short lived and are not associated with cervical cancer.

What is the solution to remove the two or three strains of human papillomavirus if the vaccines are ineffective? As in most other cases related to the prevention of infections in humans, a healthy immune system is always able to destroy viruses and bacteria that can eventually trigger infections. How do you get a healthy and strong immune system? Through the consumption of foods that are not processed, gluten-free, with no MSG’s or other  preservatives that are added to foods to keep them for long. These substances prevent the absorption of the nutrients the body needs. It is necessary to avoid eating genetically modified organisms (GMO), which also cause disturbances in our body because of its artificial and manipulated content.

Contrary to what many main stream media would have us believe, there is no pill or pharmaceutical product for every health problem. In fact, drugs are usually the cause of the illnesses suffered by most people because of their side effects. No matter how fashionable and trendy the media say it is to be vaccinated with Gardasil or Cervarix; the reality falls far short of their claims.

Por que usar a Vacina contra Vírus do Papiloma Humano?

Por Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
01 de setembro de 2011

De acordo com a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dos Estados Unidos, o vírus do Papiloma Humano não causa câncer cervical. Isso me leva a pensar e perguntar, por que uma mulher escolheria ser injetada com a vacina que supostamente combate o vírus do papiloma humano? E também, por que uma mãe ou pessoa responsável deixaria sua filha de 9 anos ser injetada com esta vacina?

No entanto, México planeja injetar a vacina do papiloma humano (HPV), em todas as meninas a partir do próximo ano, disse o ministério de saúde do país na terça-feira.

No início de 2012, a vacina contra o HPV será incluída no coquetel de injeções administradas a todas as meninas na idade de 9 anos, disse o ministro da Saúde José Angel Cordova.

Ao mesmo tempo, o ministro revelou que as mortes por câncer cervical diminuíram em 47 por cento no México durante as últimas duas décadas um número significativo, mas ainda apareceram 13,4 casos por cada 100.000 mulheres no ano passado.

A decisão de injetar de forma indiscriminada a todas as crianças é vista com confusão devido ao fato de que o vírus não causa câncer cervical, mas é eliminado naturalmente pelo corpo com a ajuda de uma boa alimentação e um sistema imunológico saudável. Mas as autoridades mexicanas querem fazer a vacina contra o HPV universal, de acordo com eles para reduzir a mortalidade por esse câncer em 50 por cento em mulheres acima de 25 anos.

HPV é sexualmente transmissível e o corpo pode eliminá-lo por si mesmo sem a ajuda de vacinas ou de produtos farmacêuticos, cita um relatório da Agence France Press. No entanto, em alguns casos, a infecção permanece e pode levar ao câncer cervical.

Cepas 16 e 18 representam 70 por cento dos casos de câncer cervical em todo o mundo, para um total de 500.000 casos por ano, segundo o Fundo para a População (UNFPA).

Embora estes números parecem alarmantes, e são para aquelas que ficam doentes com câncer cervical, a Associação Médica Americana (AMA) diz: “Não há evidências significativas para indicar qualquer benefício do uso da vacina. O desaparecimento do vírus durante períodos de 12 meses não está relacionado com o uso da vacina. É improvável que a vacinação tenha qualquer benefício significativo. ”

Por que então o México ou qualquer outro país faria a vacina contra o HPV universal e tentaria injetar suas crianças e mulheres jovens? Os fatos de que o vírus não causa câncer cervical e que a vacina é ineficaz no tratamento, devem ser adicionados ao fato que a vacina protege apenas contra dois ou três cepas de um total de mais de 100. Tudo isso sem contar os mais de 3500 efeitos colaterais sérios que a vacina causa em pacientes que têm sido injetadas.

E a infecção persistente com HPV, e não o vírus do papiloma humano em si, é o que promove ou causa lesões pré-cancerosas e câncer. Mas se a vacina não trata ou elimina o vírus, qual é o objetivo da vacina? Por outro lado, segundo a FDA, a vacina contra o HPV em mulheres que têm o papilomavírus humano aumenta o risco de câncer cervical em 44,6%, porque esta vacina promove o desenvolvimento de lesões pré-cancerosas no útero, que eventualmente levam ao câncer cervical.

A falsidade da eficácia da vacina para prevenir o câncer deve ser acrescentado a que as práticas médicas utilizadas hoje para avaliar a saúde do útero não examina se uma mulher tem câncer cervical, mas somente se ela tem o vírus HPV. Finalmente, devemos dizer que a maioria das infecções no útero são de curta duração e não associadas ao câncer cervical.

Qual é a solução para remover prevenir as duas ou três cepas do papilomavírus humano? Como na maioria dos outros casos relacionados com a prevenção de infecções em seres humanos, um sistema imunológico saudável é sempre capaz de destruir vírus e bactérias que podem eventualmente levar a infecções. Como podemos ter um sistema imunológico saudável? Através de um plano de alimentação composto de alimentos que não são processados, glúten, MSG, conservantes adicionados aos alimentos processados ​​para preservá-los por muito tempo. Essas substâncias impedem a absorção dos nutrientes que o corpo necessita. É necessário evitar o consumo de produtos geneticamente modificados (GM), que também causam distúrbios em nosso corpo pelo seu conteúdo artificial e manipulado.

Ao contrário do que a mídia querem nos fazer crer, não há uma pílula ou remédio farmacêutico para cada problema de saúde. Na verdade, as drogas são geralmente a causa das doenças sofridas pela maioria das pessoas por causa de seus efeitos colaterais. Não importa quanto os meios de comunicação digam que é moda se vacinar com Gardasil ou Cervarix, a realidade fica muito além das sua propaganda.

¿Porqué usar la Vacuna contra el Vírus del Papiloma Humano?

Por Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
1 de Septiembre 2011

Según la Agencia de Medicinas y Alimentos de Estados Unidos (FDA) el Vírus del Papiloma Humano NO causa Cáncer Cervical. Esto me lleva a pensar y preguntar, ¿Porqué una mujer se inyectaría con la vacuna que supuestamente combate el vírus del papiloma humano? y también, ¿Porqué una madre o persona responsable dejaría que su hija de 9 años sea inyectada con esta vacuna?

Sin embargo, México planea inyectar la vacuna contra el virus del papiloma humano (VPH), a todas las niñas a partir del próximo año, según dijo el ministerio de salud del país este martes.

Comenzando en 2012, la vacuna contra el VPH será incluída en el coctél de inyecciones que se administra a todas las niñas a la edad de 9 años, manifestó el ministro de Salud José Ángel Córdova.

Al mismo tiempo, el ministro reveló que las muertes por cáncer cervical habían disminuído en un 47 por ciento en México en las últimas dos décadas; un número significativo, pero que todavía habían 13,4 casos por cada 100.000 mujeres el año pasado.

La decisión de inyectar indiscriminadamente a TODAS las niñas es vista con confusión departe del público debido al hecho que el vírus no solo NO causa cáncer cervical sino que es naturalmente eliminado por el cuerpo humano con ayuda de una buena alimentación y un sistema inmune saludable. Pero las autoridades mexicanas quieren hacer la vacuna contra el VPH universal, según ellos para reducir la tasa de mortalidad por este cáncer en un 50 por ciento en mujeres mayores de 25 años.

El VPH se transmite sexualmente y la mayoría de las veces el cuerpo puede eliminarlo por sí solo, sin ayuda de vacunas o farmacéuticos, cita un reportaje de la Agence France Press. Sin embargo, en algunos casos la infección permanece y, eventualmente, puede conducir al cáncer cervical.

Las cepas 16 y 18 representan el 70 por ciento de los casos de cáncer cervical en todo el mundo, que suman alrededor de 500.000 al año, de acuerdo con el Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas (UNFPA).

Aunque estos números parezcan preocupantes, y lo son para quienes se enferman con cáncer cervical, la Asociación Médica Americana (AMA), dice que: “No hay evidencia significativa que indique ningún beneficio del uso de la vacuna. La desaparición del virus en periodos de 12 meses no está relacionado con el uso de la vacuna. No es probable que la vacunación tenga algún beneficio significativo.”

¿Porqué entonces México o cualquier otro país haría la vacuna contra el VPH universal y buscaría inyectarla a todas las niñas y mujeres? Al hecho que el vírus no cause cáncer cervical y que la vacuna es inefectiva para tratarlo, hay que agregar que la vacuna solo protege contra dos o tres cepas de un total de más de 100. Todo esto sin contar los más de 3500 graves efectos secundarios que la vacuna ha mostrado causar en pacientes que han sido inyectadas.

La infección persistente por el VPH, no el virus del papiloma humano en sí, es lo que promueve o causa las lesiones precancerosas y el cáncer. Pero si la vacuna no trata o elimina el vírus, ¿de qué sirve inyectarse? Por otro lado, según la FDA, la vacuna contra el VPH en mujeres que ya poseen el vírus del papiloma humano aumenta el riesgo de contraer cáncer cervical en un 44,6%, porque esta vacuna promueve el desarrollo de lesiones precancerosas en el cuello del útero, lo que eventualmente lleva a contraer cáncer cervical.

A la falsedad de la eficácia de la vacuna para prevenir el cáncer hay que agregar que las prácticas médicas usadas hoy en día para evaluar la salud cervical NO examinan si la mujer tiene cáncer cervical, sino la existencia del  virus VPH. Finalmente se debe decir que la mayoría de las infecciones son de corta duración y no se asocian con el cáncer cervical.

¿Cuál es la solución para eliminar las dos o tres cepas del vírus del papiloma humano si las vacunas son inefectivas? Como en casi todos los otros casos relacionados a la prevención de infecciones en humanos, un sistema inmune saludable siempre es capaz de destruir viruses y bacterias que pueden eventualmente desencadenar infecciones. ¿Cómo se logra tener un sistema inmune saludable? A través de una plan de alimentación compuesto por comidas que no son procesadas, sin gluten, glutamato monosódico que son conservantes adicionados a las comidas procesadas para conservarlas por largo tiempo. Estas substancias previenen la absorción de los nutrientes que el cuerpo humano necesita. Es necesario evitar el consumo de productos genéticamente modificados (transgénicos), que también causan alteraciones en nuestro cuerpo debido a su origen artificial y su contenido manipulado.

Al contrario de lo que muchos medios de comunicación nos quieren hacer pensar, NO existe una pastilla o un remedio farmacéutico para cada problema de salud. De hecho, los medicamentos son usualmente la causa de las enfermedades que sufren la mayoría de las personas debido a sus efectos secundários. No importa cuan moderno o a la moda los medios de comunicación digan que es vacunarse con Gardasil o Cervarix, la realidad está muy lejos de sus afirmaciones.

Mexico to give HPV vaccine to all girls ages 9 and older

August 31, 2011

MEXICO CITY — Mexico plans to administer the vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV), which can cause cervical cancer, to all girls beginning next year, the country’s health ministry said Tuesday.

Beginning in 2012, the HPV vaccine will be part of the normal course of shots given to all girls at the age of nine, Health Minister Jose Angel Cordova said.

Cervical cancer kills about 4,200 women in Mexico each year.

The minister said while deaths from cervical cancer had fallen 47 percent in the country over the past two decades, there was still 13.4 cases for every 100,000 women last year.

Mexican health authorities hope that by making the HPV vaccine universal, they can cut the mortality rate from this type of cancer by 50 percent for women over the age of 25.

HPV is sexually transmitted and most of the time the body can clear it on its own. However, in some cases the infection remains and can eventually lead to cervical cancer.

HPV types 16 and 18 account for 70 percent of cervical cancer cases worldwide, which number about 500,000 per year, according to the UN Population Fund (UNFPA).