Terrorist Israeli state threatens to decapitate Palestinian government

Foreign Affairs Minister says Israel will attack Palestine if the UN accepts its request to become an observer member state.


The Israeli threats are gaining intensity as the date approaches for the UN to decide if it recognizes Palestine as a non-member observer state. The Palestinian diplomatic initiative has strong opposition from Israel and the United States, who fear that if this initiative moves towards, Palestine may soon be recognized as a  state in its own right.

If the November 29th General Assembly of the UN grant Gaza and the West Bank a status similar to the Vatican, the doors would be left open for multilateral agencies, including Justice International to open.

Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said on Wednesday that a document had been issued that instructs Israeli ambassadors to communicate their respective capitals about Israel’s intention: “if the Palestinians go ahead with their project of recognition, Israel would dismantle the Palestinian Authority and overthrow its president, Mahmoud Abbas.”

“If the Palestinian proposal is accepted by the UN General Assembly, in our view this would be breaking the rules and cause an extreme response from us,” Lieberman said Wednesday during a visit to Ariel, one of the settlements located in Palestinian territories.

Lieberman’s threats, although serious, have not been officially confirmed by Israel. The country hasn’t talked about any reprisals that it will take if the vote favors the Palestinian membership. However, some of the measures being considered are the freezing of the transfer of taxes from Israel to Palestinian coffers, the expansion of settlements and the restriction of movement for Palestinian politicians.

Washington has not specified what the next steps will be after President Barack Obama called his Palestinian counterpart last Sunday and asked him to postpone the diplomatic initiative. “This is not about someone telling us that we should not go to the UN, but what we get in exchange for not doing it,” said Palestinian leader Mohamed Stayyeh, to reporters.

The Palestinians have calculated that a large majority of at least 130 votes in the General Assembly will vote in favor of their request. Among Europeans there is not a consensus position and the total is expected to be split. More than two years of negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis are stalled. The lack of proposals on the table and the relentless expansion of settlements has encouraged Palestinians to seek new ways to progress on its way to the creation of a Palestinian state based on the format from 1967.

The idea however is that this goal is reached through direct negotiations between the parties, who must decide on the thorniest issues, including border demarcation, the future of Palestinian refugees and Jerusalem. The Palestinians accuse Israel of not wanting to sit down and negotiate. And the Palestinians have refused to sit at the negotiating table until Israel ceases constructing settlements. More than half a million Israelis live in settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which are part of the territory of Palestine.

The Real Agenda encourages the sharing of its original content ONLY through the tools provided at the bottom of every article. Please DON’T copy articles from The Real Agenda and redistribute by email or post to the web.

Future Global Environmental Entity seeks Immunity from Prosecution


The Green Climate Fund, an entity created during the last Climate Change meeting in Durban, South Africa, is seeking diplomatic style immunity, just as the United Nations itself has it. Although the UN is the organization that sponsored the Durban Climate Change talks, the Green Climate Fund does not officially belong to the UN and therefore does not have the right to be immune from prosecution.

All things aside, an important question to ask is, why is a supposed environmental agency seeking diplomatic immunity? What kind of actions is it carrying out or will it carry out that prompts it to request such a privilege? Let’s start with the money issue. The Green Climate Fund is in charge of distributing some $ 100 billion a year, which it will receive from countries that adhere to the agreements signed during the climate conferences such as the one conducted in Durban and the next one to be held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil next June.

From those $ 100 billion that member states have pledged, the Fund intends to spend some $30 billion in projects it calls “fast start-up” endeavours. Those tasks are supposedly oriented towards helping underdeveloped nations to mitigate the effects of an imaginary climate crisis that is underway in the minds of people who believe that humanity is causing the planet to get warmer. This assertion has been at the very least found to be erroneous by thousands of independent scientists who separately observed historical data and recent measurements of water levels, CO2 emissions and planetary weather and have determined that not only is the planet not warming, but that it is indeed cooling off. (Please do your own research).

The Green Climate Fund’s only purpose is, as UN members have confessed, a plan to redistribute the wealth of the planet, except that wealth does not seem to be going to the neediest people in the poorest countries. Additionally, politicians and unelected participants in previous UN meetings plan to obtain the funding for their Green Climate Fund from taxpayer money taken from middle and lower classes in developed countries, to give it to rich folks in underdeveloped nations. How will that contribute to saving the planet from the nonexistent condition they fear so much? (Again, do your own research).

So far, 24 nations are part of an interim board of trustees ( emphasis added on interim) which in future meetings will be cut down to a handful of representatives (centralized power) that will then become the permanent members of such a board of trustees at the Green Climate Fund. After being conformed last year in Durban, the interim body will have its first meeting next month in Switzerland to elect its secretariat which should be up and running by next November

This interim body (again emphasis given on interim) already expects to spend some $6.7 million of the taxpayer resources starting now and until June 2013.

“Before it is fully operational, the GCF’s creators — 194 countries that belong to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) — want it to be immune from legal challenges and lawsuits, not to mention outside inspections, much like the United Nations itself cannot be affected by decisions rendered by a sovereign nation’s government or judicial system,” reports FoxNews.

The UNFCCC, another creation of the UN, under which the GCF operates, does not enjoy the privilege of having immunity either. This means that is not protected by the General Convention that provides the United Nations with diplomatic immunity against anything and everything. Neither the UNFCCC nor the Green Climate Fund are at this point under any type of immunity or protection, which makes their work and personnel accountable to international law and even perhaps decisions made by independent nation states. The UN cannot be affected by such decisions. The General Convention that protects the UN was established after the end of World War II.

In order for the UNFCCC to have diplomatic immunity, the organization would need to call for a vote where all members of the Kyoto Protocol must approve such a resolution. That vote must be accepted, approved or ratified before it had any legal effect. Another way in which the UNFCCC could obtain their dreamed immunity is by asking the UN General Assembly to vote on its initiative and again, all members are required to vote for the resolution to make it binding.

Neither the UN itself nor the UNFCCC seems to have a finalized written draft that explains what would their request for immunity entail. The organization is said to be working on a final document that may be presented to the UN in the next few months.

You may share our original content as long as you respect our copyright policy as shown on our website footer. Please don’t cut articles from The Real Agenda to redistribute by email or post to the web if you don’t follow our policies.

Luis Miranda is the founder and editor of The Real Agenda. For more of his stories, subscribe to our article feed. You can also follow him on Twitter and Facebook. Email article ideas and insights through the Contact page.