More Proof of Military Invasion of the United States

By LUIS MIRANDA | THE REAL AGENDA | AUGUST 28, 2012

Yesterday, The Real Agenda reported on the latest influx of foreign Russian and Chinese commandos into the United States. On August 17th, a report on   TruNewsRadio told about how inside sources in the US government have revealed details on the continuous arrival of troops who have positioned themselves in both the U.S. and Canada, in what seems to be an attempt to prepare for a military takeover of North America.

In the article sent to The Real Agenda, the author explains that a person close to TruNewsRadio host Rick Wiles, revealed how his source from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security confirmed that “Russian Spetsnaz commandos are infiltrating into the U.S.A from Canada. He said it’s been underway all summer, and he estimated the number of commandos at the present time inside the U.S.A to be in excess of 20,000.”

It is well known that both Russian and Chinese military operatives visit the U.S. to participate in so-called ‘civil drills’. The previous one known drill took place at Ft. Carson, Colorado between May 24 and 31 of this year and it may have had something to do with the ongoing clandestine immigration of Russian commandos. Besides the confirmation made by the US DHS source, other news reports from today alert about the strong presence of foreign troops on U.S. soil and that they are as close to the US military as it can get.

For example, according to CNSNews.com, both Russian and American Air Force personnel began a joint counter-terror exercise beginning Monday, with the supposed intention of preparing for a scenario that would include a hijacked plane on international airspace. There is no way the U.S. government is unaware that thousands of Russian and Chinese commandos are entering the country, and of course they know about the Air Force drills, too. One must then ask, how can two countries that have such volatile past and present, especially when it comes to military issues, meet in the air to conduct joint military exercises?

“As global powers, the United States and Russia have a special responsibility for ensuring peace and stability in the world,” said the White House back in 2009 after both governments signed an agreement to conduct the kind of military exercises that began yesterday and that also include Canadian forces.

But the seemingly warm relationship between Russia and the U.S. does not stop there. While the United States talked about the weather and political campaigns, Russian military commanders were shown inside NORAD, the North American Aerospace Defense Command. Back in 2011, NORAD deputy commander Col. Todd Balfe, shared the comfort of a Fencing 1220 aircraft with Russian Air Force Col. Alexander Vasilyev during operation Vigilant Eagle 2011; another joint military exercise.

“What makes this year interesting is that the Russian personnel from the Russian Federation air force are actually here at NORAD headquarters at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs,” said Royal Canadian Navy Lt. Al Blondin and NORAD spokesman. The close relationship between military forces isn’t even hidden from the public light, as it might have been done years ago. Russian military counterparts are now training deep within the U.S.’s defense network.

Although it seems the relationship between the two countries is cool, they remain enemies on the battle field, as the U.S. arms the terrorist rebels in Syria, while Russia has thrown its support behind Bashar-al Assad’s led government. China, another partner in the kind of military exercises being conducted today, has also been very clear about its rejection of a military attack on Syria or Iran.

While the power and influence of the United States seems to be decreasing in the financial, commercial and military areas, China and Russia appear to be taking center stage, with the Chinese running towards the position of most important economy in the world, a goal that may be achieved by as early as 2017, and the Russians imposing their will in the military side of things. While the U.S. has been unable to effectively stop China from manipulating its currency, it has also failed to complete its missile defense shield around Russia. Both China and Russia have won the battle so far when it comes to avoid an attack on Iran.

But military exercises are not the only red flags in what seems to be a quiet infiltration of foreign military groups in the United States. News about rather strange military occurrences have been reported in the last few weeks, and they just happen to involve Russia. See below as we reported yesterday:

1 – Russian Submarine in Gulf of Mexico Raises Concerns

The Russian Akula-class nuclear attack submarine ventured undetected in the Gulf of Mexico and was able to operate for weeks before being discovered only after it had left the area, raising concerns over gaps in U.S. patrols off American coasts, according to reports in The Washington Free Beacon

Source – http://global.christianpost.com/news/russian-submarine-in-gulf-of-mexico-raises-concerns-80126/

2 – Russia Moves Nuclear Missiles to Cuba

A report out of Pravda quotes President Vladimir Putin as saying that Russia has moved strategic nuclear missiles to Cuba in response to the United States’ continuing efforts to encircle Russia in Eastern Europe.

Source – http://www.prisonplanet.com/report-russia-moves-nuclear-missiles-to-cuba.html

3 – Russian Troops to ‘Seize’ CIA Facility in Elaborate War Game… on U.S. Soil

According to reports, the U.S. and Russian military will be engaging in an anti-terrorism exercise that will involve Russian paratroopers using U.S. weapons to “take and hold” the main facilities of the CIA and Denver International Airport in Colorado and the National Security Agency in Utah.

Source – http://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-russian-troops-to-seize-cia-facility-in-elaborate-war-game-on-u-s-soil/

4 – Russian Troops Coming to U.S. for Terror Drills, DoD Confirms

Russian “Airborne Assault Forces” will be arriving in Colorado this May for joint terror-war exercises with U.S. soldiers, according to U.S. officials and Russian military personnel cited in media reports. The Kremlin’s Defense Ministry and the U.S. Department of Defense both said it would be the first time in history that American and Russian airborne special operations troops would be training together on U.S. soil.

Source – http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/11002-russian-troops-coming-to-us-for-terror-drills-dod-confirms

5 – The Bear at the Door – Russian nuclear bombers test U.S. air defenses in arctic war games during chilly Obama-Putin summit

Russian strategic nuclear bombers threatened U.S. airspace near Alaska earlier this month and F-15 jets responded by intercepting the aircraft taking part in large-scale arctic war games, according to defense officials.

The Russian war games began the same day President Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a frosty summit meeting in Mexico June 18.

Source – http://freebeacon.com/the-bear-at-the-door/

To these news one has to add the fact that several U.S. Departments, including Homeland Security, Social Security Administration, FEMA and countless police departments all over the country have purchased millions of hollow point bullets in the last few months. Several U.S. cities have also served as transit lines for the movement of heavy military equipment across the country.

Is the U.S. government preparing to round up it’s citizens due to the financial collapse, or will the foreign troops do it? Will the U.S. “suffer an attack” to be used as an excuse to impose martial law? Will the U.S. military together with the Russians and Chinese turn against Americans as the only way to control the rise of the liberty movement in this country? The background information being exposed by the alternative media seems to provide enough proof, as US law enforcement have admitted to preparing to face a citizen rise up.

Choose your scenario and prepare.

Can we believe anything Breivik says?

by Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
July 25, 2011

Anders Behring Breivik

Is Anders Behring Breivik, the alleged terrorist who blew up a government building in Oslo, Norway a reliable source for the public to learn why and how he carried out the attack? His acquaintance and co-worker, Ulav Andersson, says he may have been brainwashed.

Kim Heger, the Norwegian judge seeing the case, has determined that Breivik must remain hidden in a cell under solitary confinement, away from everyone and everything. Official statements from Norwegian justice say that the supposed bomber has confessed to working with two other cells, and the judge has given him 8 weeks of detention while more details surface.

According to Reuters, the suspect confessed to using bombs and participating in the shootings, but did not admit guilt. However, the court has denied requests to elaborate on Breivik’s claims that he worked with two other cells or organizations and any extra details of the plot, where the cells are located, possible members, where he got to be part of the cells and so on.

There are some questions one can raise about Anders Behring Breivik and his recent past that could help clarify the reasons for him allegedly participating in the attacks. For example, sas he seeing a Psychiatrist recently? Was he taking any medication, such as psychotropics? Who was he in contact with, friends, associates etc… in the days, weeks and months before the attacks? Did he travel to foreign countries in the recent past? Was he enlisted to participate or did he participated in Norway’s mandatory military service? What was he trained in: military intelligence?

As we reported last night, Oslo’s and Utoya’s attacks have very serious tones of a false-flag attack, however it will not be until the above posed questions are answered that we will be able to definitely say whether it is or not. The fact that Breivik acted alone or otherwise as part of a cell, does not tell much about whether he is a patsy or not. What is strange as the news continue to develop, is that Norwegian authorities are being sketchy about the information they put out. If they believe people should know Breivik confessed to participating in the attacks, shouldn’t the public also be awarded elaborated reports about what he has told police?

The practice of skimming information and feeding only little bits of it could be seen as a tactic by police not to interrupt or cause harm to their investigation, but if they already have the alleged bomber confessing to the crime, what else is there to know? Would not Breivik provide all the information police needs to continue their work? On the other hand, and given recent history, it is more likely that authorities prefer not to reveal details because they may have to come out and correct parts that do not make sense in order to keep people unaware of the real facts. It is much easier to control information when there is only one person making public statements about this terrorist attack than when there are 2 or 3.

In any case, what credibility does any statement from Breivik has as he has already changed his story twice in three days? If he was brainwashed as Andersson suggested, there is even less credibility on anything he says.  “The accused has made statements today that require further investigation, including that ‘there are two more cells in our organization,” judge Heger said during a news conference.

UPDATE (25 JULY 1, 35 PM):

Norwegian authorities now say the death toll is lower than what was published prematurely. A total of 76 individuals and NOT 92.

Oslo Terror Attack has False-flag Tones

by Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
July 24, 2011

As the Real Agenda warned on Thursday, the likelihood of a false-flag terror attack was ever more possible than in the last few years. In our article published on Thursday July 21, we focused attention on a new video put out by the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA in the United States which specifically pointed to white or caucasian males as potential threats for terrorism. In the video, both organizations portrayed white men dropping off car bombs in a federal building and activating explosives on a street somewhere.

What are the chances that the very next day, a supposed white terrorist attacked a government building in Oslo, Norway? What are the chances that the alleged bomber used one of the two methods showed in the Homeland Security video? What are the chances that it was a white male with Christian Conservative beliefs?

One only needs to take a look at the history and the main traits that past terrorist attacks had and compare them to the bomb attack in Oslo, but that could have occurred anywhere else in the world. First of all, the main stream media rapidly came out blaming muslim extremists for the attack to later change their story and blame “white” Al-Qaeda for the attacks in Oslo and Utoya.

Another part that coincides with other false-flag attacks is that the supposed perpetrator is presented as acting alone, and when the fake public relations media stories fail to convince the public, new details are added to make the story live for another day. Now, police say they have a second man in custody who supposedly acted together with Anders Behring Breivik to carry out both attacks. The same lone patsy scheme was offered by authorities during the Oklahoma City bombing and the World Trade Center attack in 1993.

Another piece of information that does not make sense is that the terrorist attack happened on a holiday, when most government workers were not at their desks. Why would a terrorist take the time and work to carry out an attack and make it happen during a holiday? Why would a terrorist group attack a mostly empty building on a holiday? Oslo’s bomb blast comes in times of economic hardship in Europe while the government is experiencing low levels of approval from the public and after Norway announced the withdrawal of its troops from the NATO force that is bombing Libya and other countries in Africa.

Anders Behring Breivik is a white caucasian of 32 years of age, who calls himself a Christian Conservative and as some reports rumor, a Freemason. Nothing against freemasons here. No way though, a “lone wolf” killed 92 people in Norway. In fact, another man has been apprehended. Is the information posted on Breivik’s Facebook page an attempt to frame Christian Conservatives to later label them as potential terrorists? That is a very likely scenario, because that is what governments did with muslims after 9/11. See Anders Behring Breivik´s Facebook page here.

To all this we have to add that police delayed any action in the island of Utoya for 90 minutes. That allowed the shooter there to carry out its plan to shoot everyone who he found while the police arrived. During 9/11, fighting jets were also delayed by at least one hour which allowed the planes to make their way to New York City. The dying dinosaur main stream media blamed Muslims for Norway’s attack with zero evidence and also blamed “white” Al-Qaeda, again, with no proof of it.

Given the fact that Norway’s Prime Minister was supposed to meet and talk to the youngsters in Utoya, it makes it too convenient that the bomb in the government building was a well placed distraction to help the shooters in Utoya carry out the killings. Another convenient fact is that Anders Behring Breivik was supposedly a farmer. He was seen buying six tons of fertilizer before the massacre, his supplier said Saturday. The shooting started just hours after the explosion that destroyed the government building in Oslo where the prime minister’s office was located.

According to historian and researcher Webster G. Tarpley, the terror attack in Oslo has “telltale signs of a false flag provocation”.

It is reported that, although the world media are attempting to focus on Anders Behring Breivik as a lone assassin in the tradition of Lee Harvey Oswald, many eyewitnesses agree that a second shooter was active in the massacre at the Utøya summer youth camp outside of Oslo. It has also come to light that a special police unit had been conducting a drill or exercise in downtown Oslo which involved the detonation of bombs – exactly what caused the bloodshed a few hundred meters away little more than 48 hours later. Further research reveals that United States intelligence agencies had been conducting a large-scale program of recruiting retired Norwegian police officers with the alleged purpose of conducting surveillance inside the country. This program, known as SIMAS Surveillance Detection Units, provided a perfect vehicle for the penetration and subversion of the Norwegian police by NATO. “

According to Norwegian media, several drills were conducted in the days before the attacks in Oslo, with men in black suits climbing down the walls of buildings downtown Oslo, just a few hundred meters from the prime minister’s office. This behaviour matches actions carried out in previous false-flag attacks such as the one on September 11, 2001. What government drills allow for is the collocation of explosives or car bombs -which may be part of the drill- and that in theory are fake explosives and fake car bombs, but that in reality are real explosives and real car bombs. Those who participate in the drills may or may not know about the real explosives or bombs, because the equipment and materials used during such drills are most often than not “real world” ones. The fact that drills occurred also protect those who may be to blame for the attack because “everything was part of the drill” and no one knew there were real explosives or real car bombs involved.

Another trait that makes the bomb blast in Oslo strange is that an acquaintance of Anders Behring Breivik, Ulav Andersson, says he may have been brainwashed. Anderson was also Breivik’s co-worker.

Breivik also attended Knight’s Templar meetings and as we reported before, he seems to also be a Freemason. The only thing that has not happened in Oslo’s terror attack is that Breivik has not been mysteriously murdered in prison or hung himself in his cell as it happened in other cases. But new developments will be unfolding in the following days and this outcome would not be a surprise.

While all this information is out there clearly pointing to false-flag attack, the main stream media and their security and terrorism experts choose to ignore them and go blame the Christian Conservative extremists.