The United Nations and its Agenda 21 are Unsustainable

By LUIS MIRANDA | THE REAL AGENDA | JULY 16, 2012

If the whole story about how the United Nations wants to control the world, impose limits over human development and transform current standards of living into a thing of the past seems far fetched or too complicated to understand, I don’t blame you. It is complicated. One of the reasons for that is the UN and its controllers managed to create policies they’ve been able to implement under the auspices of saving the planet and keeping resources available for future generations.

In reality, though, the United Nations and its Agenda 21 program are not sustainable at all. In fact, they are exactly the opposite. Both the organization and its policies are an attempt to end human freedom as enjoyed by millions and millions of people throughout history. Agenda 21 intends to change our lives in every single way you can imagine, and it has been doing so more vehemently since it was approved and adopted during UN meetings in 1992. Thanks to Agenda 21 and policies derived from it, children have been deliberately dumbed down, the family unit has been almost completely destroyed and the planet’s resources have been concentrated in the fewest amount of hands ever.

The policies stemmed from Agenda 21 are in our schools, workplace, places of worship, community groups and other social gatherings. They were introduced and seamlessly imposed on all of us under the disguise of being environmentally conscious and now, the UN intends to perpetuate their reach by mentally and physically kidnapping a complete generation of children who will be, according to the UN’s plans, the willful perpetrators of such anti-human endeavor.

In the following video, you will find a compilation of explanation about some of the most important aspects that the United Nations seeks to impose its will on through Agenda 21. Please watch it carefully and consider to research even further than the points touched upon on the video. If you have not read the text of Agenda 21, please do so. It is a short and bitter insight of the kind of world you and your children will live in if humanity does not act NOW.

The Agenda 21 document is composed by 40 chapters that explain specific goals the UN wants to implement on a global basis. If fully adopted, it will permanently alter the way of living of billions of people around the planet. People will have to change the way they make decisions and the ways they eat, learn, communicate, manage private property, consume resources such as electricity and water. A society managed under Agenda 21 policies will be a highly monitored one where individuals will be spied on without their consent — much like today — 24 /7. The initiative will also place most national parts, conservation areas and their boundaries off limits to any human activity.

The deep meaning of what Agenda 21 intends to achieve is contained in a statement from the United Nations number 1 climate alarmist, Maurice Strong, who in a 1992 conference told attendees that “consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing, are not sustainable”. He added that a drastic change was necessary and that such change would involve the creation of an international platform composed by a multilateral system that included the United Nations.

Strong’s words mirror what is taking place today all over the planet, where the middle class is being attacked for their successes as business owners, job creators and consumers. People are no longer able to have their own vegetable garden, drive their favorite car, consume raw milk or cheese, and children are not allowed to sell lemonade to chip in for a school project. The UN continues to try to do away with private property, individual liberty, privacy rights and so on, while demanding that taxpayers finance the creation of a global governance scheme to be controlled by its minions.

The UN has proposed carbon taxes, currency taxes, demanded more money for its supposed aid programs which it says are genuine global challenges and has also planned for the creation of an authoritative body to enforce global tax collection. The United Nations introduced its Sustainable Development propaganda program more than two decades ago under the premise that it intended to bring about “social justice”, under which the governments — that are the UN’s local auditor — must control every aspect  of an individual’s life. This proposal violates virtually every part of every single  Constitution.

Under the scheme the UN is implanting through Agenda 21, it becomes clear that what is really unsustainable are the UN and its Agenda 21.

Rockefeller Study: Future Dictatorship Controlled by Elite

Paul Joseph Watson

Global pandemics that kill millions, mandatory quarantines, checkpoints, biometric ID cards, and a world of top-down government control. These things are not lifted from the latest sci-fi blockbuster movie, they’re part of the Rockefeller Foundation’s vision for what the globe might be like in 15-20 years’ time under a new world order tightly controlled by the elite.

This is one of four scenarios for the future of the planet outlined in the Rockefeller Foundation’s “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development,” a study produced in association with the Global Business Network.

Entitled “Lock Step,” the scenario depicts,”A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.”

After global H1N1 pandemic originating from geese infects 20 per cent of the global population and kills 8 million people, the economy grinds to a halt and governments impose authoritarian measures to respond to the crisis.

“During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and

restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets,” states the study.

Tellingly, even after the pandemic fades, these draconian measures remain in place and even intensify, as leaders take a “firmer grip on power” and citizens willingly sacrifice their sovereignty and privacy, leading to “a more controlled world” bossed by “paternalistic states” who impose biometric ID cards for all citizens. “Enforced cooperation” with global regulatory agreements forges the path towards global governance even as a backlash ensues following public displays of “virulent nationalism”.

Eco-fascism is also brought to the fore in the “lock step” scenario, which discusses how “high-emission” cars will be banned and every home will be forced to install solar panels by law.

The implementation of top-down authoritarianism causes entrepreneurial activity to wither and the economy stutters, but by 2025 people start to grow weary of “so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them” and an organized “pushback” against this tyranny begins to gather momentum.

“Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish,” the study concludes.

The important thing to understand from the scenario outlined by the Rockefeller study is that China is praised as the model for how governments globally should respond to crises. The most draconian and dictatorial policies, including mandatory quarantines, are praised in the scenario as having “saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post pandemic recovery,” while allowing people freedom of mobility is scorned as having worsened the crisis.

Ironic therefore it is that just this week, the Associated Press reported on how the Chinese government has already virtually imposed checkpoint quarantines on its poorer citizens, by “gating and locking some of its lower-income neighborhoods overnight, with police or security checking identification papers around the clock, in a throwback to an older style of control.”

The Rockefeller study is not a warning against preventing the kind of tyranny contained in this scenario from unfolding, it’s a blueprint for how globalists want to exploit global crises like bio-terror attacks and pandemics in order to completely destroy society and rebuild it under a new world order in their image.

The Rockefeller scenario bears more than a passing resemblance to a 2007 UK Ministry of Defence study which forecast that by 2035, people would have brain chips implanted, that the middle class would become revolutionary, and that society would be gripped by chaos and civil unrest as a result of increased globalization, immigration and a more authoritarian state.

It is crystal clear from reading the “Lock Step” scenario that the oppressive society portrayed in the study is not presented as an admonishment of how governments would cynically seize upon a pandemic to set up a police state and empower themselves as dictators, it’s a ringing endorsement that this approach would be the correct thing to do.

This is the post-industrial society demanded by Bilderberg luminaries like European Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso.

This is what the globalists want – pandemics, warfare, chaos and crises that they can engineer and then exploit to lock in place a dictatorial society ruled by the elite from their ivory towers, while the citizens are reduced to impoverished, squabbling, dependent peasants tightly controlled with sophisticated big brother technology, far too concerned about where their next meal is coming from to have time to overthrow their new rulers.