Obama birth record ‘definitely fraudulent’

The following is a compilation of news reports regarding Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigation of Barack Obama’s fraudulent records as reported today.

THE REAL AGENDA | JULY 18, 2012

From Associated Press

Investigators for an Arizona sheriff’s volunteer posse have declared that President Barack Obama’s birth certificate is definitely fraudulent.

Members of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s posse said in March that there was probable cause that Obama’s long-form birth certificate released by the White House in April 2011 was a computer-generated forgery.

Now, Arpaio says investigators are positive it’s fraudulent.

Mike Zullo, the posse’s chief investigator, said numeric codes on certain parts of the birth certificate indicate that those parts weren’t filled out, yet those sections asking for the race of Obama’s father and his field of work or study were completed.

Zullo said investigators previously didn’t know the meaning of codes but they were explained by a 95-year-old former state worker who signed the president’s birth certificate. Zullo said a writer who published a book about Obama’s birth certificate and was aiding investigators let them listen in on an interview he conducted of the former state worker.

The Obama campaign declined to comment on Arpaio’s allegations.

The Arizona Democratic Party said in a statement that Arpaio’s investigation is intended to draw attention away from problems within his own agency, such as hundreds of sex-crime cases that the sheriff’s office failed to adequately investigate over a three-year period.

So-called “birthers” maintain Obama is ineligible to be president because, they contend, he was born in Kenya.

Hawaii officials have repeatedly confirmed Obama’s citizenship, and state officials did again Tuesday.

“President Obama was born in Honolulu and his birth certificate is valid,” Joshua A. Wisch, a special assistant to Hawaii’s attorney general, said in a statement. “Regarding the latest allegations from a sheriff in Arizona, they are untrue, misinformed, and misconstrue Hawaii law.”

Wisch also said that “not only are Hawaii’s vital records some of the best managed, but they also have some of the strongest restrictions on access to prevent identity theft and fraud.”

Obama released a copy of his long-form birth certificate in an attempt to quell citizenship questions.

Courts have rebuffed lawsuits over the issue.

From World Net Daily:

Arpaio’s Obama probe finds ‘national security threat’

After determining earlier this year there is probable cause to suspect the document released by the White House as Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said today he believes his Cold Case Posse’s investigation should be advanced to the federal government, based on further information released today at a press conference under way now in Phoenix that is being live-streamed by WND.

Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo said the new information confirms the document presented to the American public in April 2011 is undoubtedly fraudulent. The Obama campaign declined to comment on Arpaio’s allegations.

Arpaio told WND he intends to move the investigation and the new information to a higher authority within the federal government because of what he calls an imminent threat to national security and U.S. immigration laws. The threat is posed by a flaw in Hawaii’s law discovered by his investigators that allows a foreigner to obtain a Hawaii birth certificate.

“Although I am having a difficult time deciding who to forward this information to given the fact that the obvious choices report directly to the president, I cannot stand by and hold on to information that threatens to weaken national security,” Arpaio said.

Arpaio said he intends on keeping a case file open if more information surfaces or if federal authorities decide to ignore the case.

Zullo explained that along with new information discovered regarding the birth certificate since the posse’s March 1 press conference, his team has discovered Hawaii provides easy access to a birth certificate, even if the child wasn’t born in the state.  Read Full Article →

From Washington Times:

Arpaio calls Congress to move on Obama eligibility

At the conclusion of a press conference led by Cold Case Posse chief investigator Michael Zullo that detailed the reasons the long-form birth certificate of President Barack Obama is a forgery, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said it’s time for a higher authority to investigate the issue.

Mr. Arpaio said he would like Congress … “someone” … to look at the material his investigative team had gathered. As he had told WND earlier: “Although I am having a difficult time deciding who to forward this information to given the fact that the obvious choices report directly to the president, I cannot stand by and hold on to information that threatens to weaken national security.”

The press conference held Tuesday clarified some of the issues discussed in an earlier press conference held in Phoenix on March 1, at which the Cold Case Posse presented its initial findings of a six-month-long investigation into the authenticity of President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. “I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic,” Mr. Arpaio said at the time.

Tuesday’s press conference added weight to the Cold Case Posse’s earlier findings. In addition to the electronic evidence that the president’s long-form birth certificate had been altered, the investigators introduced supporting evidence related to a box titled “Race of Father.” In it was written the word “African.” Not only was “African” not used as a race identifier until 1989, 28 years after Obama’s birth, but the box is also coded with a number nine. Nine signifies that no information was provided, meaning the box should have been empty. The fact that there is information in the box suggests someone had tampered with the birth certificate, investigators say.

The press conference also discussed the recent trip to Hawaii by lead investigator Michael Zullo and others to further investigate the anomalies associated with the president’s birth certificate. Mr. Zullo and his team received a cold reception and most doors were closed to them. Hawaiian officials also tended to over-react to their presence. In at least one case, local police were called.

In Hawaii, investigators succeeded in meeting with Verna K.L. Lee, the clerk who signed Mr. Obama’s long-form birth certificate. The investigators learned that if Mr. Obama had been born at the Kapioloni Medical Center, a birth number assigned to him should have been lower than those of a pair of twins who were born after him at Kapiolani that same day. Yet, his birth number is higher. “This proves that Obama could not have been born at the Kapiolani Medical Center as reported. The numbering on his certificate is more consistent with a birth certificate that had been turned in from one of the outlying areas,” investigators said.

Sheriff Arpaio Confirms it: Obama’s Birth Certificate is a Forgery

by Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
March 2, 2012

It wasn’t necessary but Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigation has added more salt and pepper to an issue that only the marginalized “birthers” used to talk about. Them and the alternative media were called kooks and conspiracy theorists for suspecting and then proving that Barack H. Obama’s birth certificate was a fake. Arpaio is probably the only “main stream” figure that has had the time, the will and the guts to investigate this issue, and the conclusion wasn’t a surprise. We all knew it.

Mr. Arpaio has appeared extremely cautious, even though there isn’t a reason for that caution. He said: “Based on all of the evidence presented and investigated, I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic.” He added that his investigators determined that the certificate was a computer creation, just as it was widely reported by the non-corporate media. “It’s a computer-generated forgery”. His investigation found out that the copy that we all saw on many media outlets was not legitimate, as the White House claimed it was.

The political show this issue turned into back in 2011 and even before ended today. No more name-calling, no more insults to those who used all kinds of tools to denounce what Sheriff Arpaio confirmed today. Perhaps after trying to humiliate the “birthers” the corporate media will try to do the same with Arpaio, too. But the public knows that this president was not born in this country and that therefore he should not be sitting in the Oval Office unless he can prove he is indeed a citizen. Unfortunately, they can’t do that because he isn’t American by birth and therefore there wouldn’t be a way to produce a real certificate. Otherwise, why haven’t they produced it already?

Obama has been lying about his place of birth for at least four years, as he presented documents to support his American birth back in 2008 while he was running for the presidency. Is there a way to check if the other documents are also fake? Sure there is, and I’d like to think that Arpaio and his team or anyone else for that matter will ride the wave and continue to dig deeper into whether those documents are also fake or if they hold a grain of truth. One thing we know; Obama was not born in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961.

So where was Obama born then? In Kenya? Who knows. The issue at hand is that the White House used a forged document to support the claim that Obama was born on American soil. This specific matter is what the president needs to answer for immediately. This time, however, bad jokes at press events won’t suffice. His eligibility to remain as president of the United States or to “apply for the job” again is something much too important for this country and nothing less than a complete investigation to find out who forged the birth certificate and how it went through the White House’s legal machine without any problem whatsoever are two questions that must kick start an in-depth investigation.

All that Sheriff Arpaio’s credible investigation concludes is that the document is a forgery and as a consequence, the only proof available — given Obama’s obscure  past — to assure anyone that Obama is a natural-born citizen is invalid. Given this fact, we can conclude, unless proven wrong by the authentic certificate, that Obama is the first non-natural-born president of the United States.

According to Arpaio his investigations unveiled at least two crimes, both of them through forgery. He was clear that he wasn’t arguing that Obama wasn’t a US citizen, but that the certificate was not authentic. Well, if the certificate is not authentic and there isn’t any other way to confirm his birthplace, isn’t safe to assume there is at least a 50 percent chance he is not a natural-born citizen? How’s that for a continuation of Arpaio’s investigation? The Maricopa County Sheriff put out a 10-page report with details of his investigation which include “inconsistencies” in the text characters of the birth certificate image the White House used as an original and authentic copy. This document raises the same questions that the White House itself, the corporate media and the Obamanoids had turned down as kooky or irrelevant last year. What many did not realize is that the supposed independent fact-checkers who called the certificate “authentic” simply corroborated that the document was as described by the White House, not whether the claims made by the House of Obama were true or false.

Sheriff Arpaio was persecuted last year by the Justice Department an entity that tried to legitimize complaints about civil rights abuses. Is it possible that such accusation were made so Arpaio stopped his investigation? The Sheriff confirmed that the petition to investigate the legitimacy of the certificate came from Tea Party members from the town of Surprise, Arizona and that it began before the Justice Department put out the civil rights complaints out to the media.

What recourse does Obama or the White House have to make the case that the current president is not as fake of an American as the birth certificate they claimed to be real? Well, they won’t be able to use any documentation held in Kenya, because according to Journalist and investigator Jerome Corsi, those documents disappeared mysteriously from the public record before he traveled to the African country in 2011.

No Record exists of Obama’s Birth in the U.S.

Hawaii governor says he cannot find birth certificate, only a written note supported by a newspaper ad.

Mail Online
January 20, 2011

Pressure was mounting on Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie today amid increasing confusion over whether President Obama was born there.

Abercrombie said on Tuesday that an investigation had unearthed papers proving Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961.

He told Honolulu’s Star-Advertiser: ‘It actually exists in the archives, written down,’ he said.

But it became apparent that what had been discovered was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate.

And in the same interview Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

He said efforts were still being made to track down definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii.

Abercrombie was asked: ‘You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plan to release more information regarding President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. How is that coming?’

He acknowledged the birth certificate issue would  have ‘political implications’ for the next presidential election ‘that we simply cannot have’.

Read Full Article