Pharmacists getting Cancer from dispensing Chemotherapy Chemicals

Natural News

One of the side effects of chemotherapy is, ironically, cancer. The cancer doctors don’t say much about it, but it’s printed right on the chemo drug warning labels (in small print, of course). If you go into a cancer treatment clinic with one type of cancer, and you allow yourself to be injected with chemotherapy chemicals, you will often develop a second type of cancer as a result. Your oncologist will often claim to have successfully treated your first cancer even while you develop a second or third cancer directly caused by the chemo used to treat the original cancer.

There’s nothing like cancer-causing chemotherapy to boost repeat business, huh?

During all this, the pharmacists are peddling these toxic chemotherapy chemicals to their customers as if they were medicine (which they aren’t). While preparing these toxic chemical prescriptions, it turns out that pharmacists are exposing themselves to cancer-causing chemotherapy agents in the process. And because of that, pharmacists are giving themselves cancer… and they’re dying from it.

Why pharmacists are dying of cancer?

People who live in glass houses should never throw stones, they say. And you might similarly say that pharmacists who deal in poison shouldn’t be surprised to one day discover they are killing themselves with it.

Chemotherapy drugs are extremely toxic to the human body, and they are readily absorbed through the skin. The very idea that they are even used in modern medicine is almost laughable if it weren’t so downright disturbing and sad that hundreds of thousands of people are killed each year around the world by chemotherapy drugs.

Now you can add pharmacists to that statistic. For decades, they simply looked the other way, pretending they were playing a valuable role in our system of “modern” medicine, not admitting they were actually doling out chemicals that killed people. Now, the sobering truth has struck them hard: They are in the business of death, and it is killing them off, one by one.

The Seattle Times now reports the story of Sue Crump, a veteran pharmacist of two decades who spent much of her time dispensing chemotherapy drugs. Sue died last September of pancreatic cancer, and one of her dying wishes was that the truth would be told about how her on-the-job exposure to chemotherapy chemicals contributed to her own cancer.

Second-hand chemo

The Occupational Safety and Health Association (OSHA), it turns out, does not regulate workplace exposure to toxic, cancer-causing chemotherapy chemicals. At first glance, that seems surprising, since OSHA regulates workplace exposure to far less harmful chemicals. Why not chemo?

The answer is because the toxicity of chemotherapy has long been ignored by virtually everyone in medicine and the federal government. It has always been assumed harmless or even “safe” just because it’s used as a kind of far-fetched “medicine” to treat cancer. This, despite the fact that chemotherapy is a derivative of the mustard gas used against enemy soldiers in World War I. Truthfully, chemotherapy has more in common with chemicals weapons than any legitimate medicine.

So today, while workers are protected from secondhand smoke in offices across the country, pharmacists are still being exposed every single day to toxic, cancer-causing chemicals that OSHA seems to just ignore. The agency has only issued one citation in the last decade to a hospital for inadequate safety handling of toxic chemotherapy drugs.

As the Seattle Times reports, “A just-completed study from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) — 10 years in the making and the largest to date — confirms that chemo continues to contaminate the work spaces where it’s used and in some cases is still being found in the urine of those who handle it…”

That same article goes on to report more pharmacists, veterinarians and nurses who are dead or dying from chemotherapy exposure:

• Bruce Harrison of St. Louis (cancer in his 50’s, now dead)
• Karen Lewis of Baltimore (cancer in her 50’s, still living)
• Brett Cordes of Scottsdale, Arizona (cancer at age 35, still living)
• Sally Giles of Vancouver, B.C. (cancer in her 40’s, now dead)

The great contradiction in cancer treatments

As the Seattle Times reports:

“Danish epidemiologists used cancer-registry data from the 1940s through the late 1980s to first report a significantly increased risk of leukemia among oncology nurses and, later, physicians. Last year, another Danish study of more than 92,000 nurses found an elevated risk for breast, thyroid, nervous-system and brain cancers.”

The story goes on to report how new safety rules are being put in place across the industry to protect pharmacists, veterinarians, nurses and doctors from toxic chemotherapy chemicals. But even the Seattle Times, which deserves credit for running this story, misses the bigger point:

If these chemicals are so dangerous to the doctors, nurses and pharmacists dispensing them, how can they be considered “safe enough” to inject into patients who are already dying from cancer?

It’s a serious question. After all, if nurses can become violently ill after merely spilling chemotherapy chemicals on themselves (it’s true), then what effect do you suppose these chemicals have when injected into patients?

The cancer industry, though, has never stopped injecting patients long enough to ask the commonsense question: Why are we in the business of dispensing poison in the first place? Poison, after all, isn’t medicine. Not when dispensed in its full potency, anyway.

The whole idea of “safety” in the cancer industry is to find new ways to protect the health care workers from the extremely dangerous chemicals they’re still injecting into the bodies of patients. Something is clearly wrong with this picture… if health care workers need to be protected from this stuff, why not protect the patients from it, too?

Nobody ever died from handling herbs

In contrast to all this, consider the truthful observation that no naturopath ever died from handling medicinal herb, homeopathy remedies or nutritional supplements. These natural therapies are good for patients, and as a bonus, you don’t have to wear a chemical suit to handle them.

Furthermore, medicinal herbs, supplements and natural remedies don’t cause cancer. They support and protect the immune system rather than destroying it. So they make patients healthier and more resilient rather than weaker and fragile.

But herbs, supplements and natural remedies don’t earn much money for the cancer industry. Only the highly-toxic patented chemotherapy drugs bring in the big bucks. So that’s what they deal in — poison for the patients. And when you deal in poison, some of it always splashes back onto you.

Chemotherapy doesn’t work

Beyond this whole issue of pharmacists and health care workers dying from exposure to secondhand chemotherapy, there’s the issue of whether chemotherapy actually works in the first place. Scientifically speaking, if you take a good, hard look at what the published studies actually say, chemotherapy is only effective at treating less than two percent of the cancers that exist. And that two percent does not include breast cancer or prostate cancer.

Yet chemotherapy is routinely used to “treat” breast cancer even though it offers no benefit to breast cancer patients. In effect, the cancer industry is engaged in a criminal treatment hoax that promises to make you healthier but actually gives you even more cancer — which is great for repeat business, but terrible for the cancer patients who suffer under it.

The level of quackery at work right now in the cancer industry is simply astonishing. You would think that if doctors and pharmacists were dishing out these chemicals to patients, they would make sure there was some sort of legitimate science to back them up. But they haven’t. The science doesn’t exist. Chemotherapy doesn’t work at anything other than causing cancer — and it accomplishes that indiscriminately, damaging any person it comes into contact with. Merely touching chemotherapy chemicals is dangerous for your health.

So if you’re considering chemotherapy for yourself, think about this long and hard: If chemotherapy is so dangerous that it’s giving the pharmacists cancer just from touching it, why on earth would you want to inject it into your body?

This is not an idle question. It is perhaps the most important question of all for someone considering conventional cancer treatment using chemotherapy. The question is essentially this: If chemotherapy causes cancer, how can it treat cancer?

Treating cancer with chemotherapy is like treating alcoholism with vodka. It’s like treating heart disease with cheese, or like treating diabetes with high-fructose corn syrup. Cancer cannot be cured by the very thing that causes it.

And to those who deal in poison, watch out for the cause-and-effect laws of biology. If you deal in chemotherapy chemicals, don’t be surprised if you get cancer one day. If you deal in chemical pesticides, don’t be surprised if you get Alzheimer’s. If you’re a dentist installing mercury fillings in the mouths of clients, don’t be surprised if one day you just go stark raving mad (because mercury causes insanity, and dentists breathe in mercury vapor thrown into the air from their drills).

If you work around chemicals, they will eventually impact your health, and never in a good way. There’s a karmic element in all this, too: If you spend your life dishing out chemotherapy drugs as a pharmacist, you have a lot to answer for. You have been an enabler of a very real chemical holocaust against the people. Don’t be surprised if that holocaust turns against you one day. Karma tends to work that way. Cause and effect is a universal law that cannot be escaped.

And if you’re a cancer patient, I urge you to think twice about the toxicity of anything you might allow in your body. If you are trying to HEAL your body, why would you allow yourself to be poisoned with a chemical that causes cancer?

Don’t let some cancer doctor talk you into chemotherapy using his fear tactics. They’re good at that. So next time he insists that you take some chemotherapy, ask him to drink some first. If your oncologist isn’t willing to drink chemotherapy in front of you to prove it’s safe, why on earth would you agree to have it injected in your body?

Pentagon Virus Detector Knows You Are Sick Before You Do

WIRED

Imagine knowing you’ll be too sick to go to work, before the faintest hint of a runny nose or a sore throat. Now imagine thatviruspreemptive diagnosis being transmitted to a national, web-based influenza map — simply by picking up the phone.

That’s the impressive potential of an ongoing Pentagon-funded research project, spearheaded by geneticists at Duke University. Since 2006, they’ve been hunting for a genetic signature that can accurately assess, well before symptoms appear, whether someone’s been infected with a virus. Eight months into a $19.5 million grant from Darpa, the Pentagon’s out-there research agency, the expert behind the program is anticipating a tool with implications far beyond military circles.

Dr. Geoffrey Ginsburg, director of Duke’s Institute for Genome Science & Policy, is collaborating with a team of colleagues to create a gadget that can detect viral infection hours before the sniffles. Between 2006 and 2009, his team made rapid strides in identifying 30 genetic markers, found through blood samples, that are activated by a virus.

They’ve since moved to human trials, testing 80 people in four studies. Healthy participants were exposed to three different viral strains. Their blood, saliva and urine were then tested for “viral specific signatures,” that would characterize illness.

“Traditionally, we’ve diagnosed these conditions by testing for the actual pathogen, but that’s a slow process and it’s not effective until you’re already symptomatic,” Ginsburg told Danger Room. “To look at the actual host response instead is a really novel approach.”

It’s an approach that Darpa sees as a tactic to boost war-zone performance. By checking soldiers for genetic markers of illness before they’re deployed, the military hopes to optimize the outcome of a given mission. The idea would also prevent an outbreak of illness in close military quarters, by quarantining troops before they have a chance to infect others.

But what Ginsburg and company didn’t anticipate was just how widespread the benefits of the Darpa initiative would be. Not only have they found a specific genetic signature that indicates viral infection, but the team has concluded that viruses and bacterial infections trigger different genes. Which means physicians could one day know whether to prescribe antibiotics, which can treat bacteria but not viruses. The drugs are so overused and wrongly prescribed, experts at a recent congressional hearingwarned that Americans face “a post antibiotic era.”

“This would eliminate the ‘default’ of giving antibiotics, which is a significant public health concern,” Ginsburg said. “So what we’d have, essentially, is a tool to drastically improve clinical judgment in a day-to-day setting, which wasn’t a Darpa goal, but a corollary benefit because we had a chance to find these specific signatures.”

And Ginsburg has a more elaborate vision for the devices, which he hopes to see shrink down from “suitcase size” to that of “a diabetic glucometer,” which would use a finger pinprick to test for illness.

“Imagine a sensor attached to your telephone, that instantly diagnoses viral agents and transmits that to a central community database,” he said. “Google used searches to beat the CDC at tracking H1N1 — this would be surveillance that could take that to the next level.”

Ginsburg anticipates a suitcase-sized device in the war-zone within “a couple years,” and says the devices are already showing excellent accuracy 24 hours before an infected patient becomes symptomatic. In an effort to validate the results in a real-world setting, his team has turned to Duke’s campus, using crowded dorms — already human petri dishes of infection — as improvised research labs.

Now, Ginsburg’s biggest concern is that the devices will be ready before the Food and Drug Administration, who’ve yet to establish regulatory benchmarks for genetic tests, knows what to do with them.

“The major uncertainty, in my mind, is the regulatory atmosphere,” he said. “These are such a new diagnostic tool, the FDA is still trying to figure out not only how to supervise them, but whether they even need to.”

Which is a barrier for the doctor’s office, but not necessarily the war-zone.

“There’s a lot of motivation within the Pentagon to get this going,” he said. “So they might have a way around the rulebook.”

AIDS: The Greatest Mass Synthetic Weapon

Funded by Congress in 1969 Through House Bill 15090, the AIDS Virus was Created After 1974

By Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
November 5, 2007

Proof that the AIDS virus is man-made and not naturally born, pile on as more information turns public and access to more and moreAIDS documents that reach more and more people become available. The account that the AIDS virus was originally found in a monkey, and that from it, the virus somehow jumped to humans has been debunked; to use a popular term.

The most eye-opening piece of evidence is government documents; more specifically the House of Representatives H.R 15090 from 1969 which details how and when the second branch of government held hearings and funded a project in which the Department of Defense would utilize $10 million to research and create a synthetic virus that would then be tested in humans in the form of an injection.

After ten years of investigation, the virus was created sometime after 1974 and was experimented with by injecting humans as early as 1977. Although in the US the Department of Defense requested the financing and promoted the creation of the virus, entities like the World Health Organization and the United Nations had previously called for a bio weapon of the sort. The World Health Organization (WHO), started to inject AIDS -laced smallpox vaccine into Africans in 1977, while the Center for Disease Control (CDC) injected some 2000 white males with laced Hepatitis B vaccine in 1978.

According to the Strecker Memorandum of 1983, AIDS is a man-made disease, which is not specific of homosexuals, not venereal and which can be carried by mosquitoes. In addition, it is clear that although condoms would help reduce the chances of infection, they would not prevent the at least six types of AIDS viruses available. Dr. Theodore Strecker writes: “The US National Cancer Institute in collaboration with the World Health Organization manufactured AIDS in a laboratory at Fort Detrich, Maryland.” The AIDS virus is a combination of two retroviruses. One is the Bovine Leukemia Virus, and the second the Visna Virus which were injected into human tissue in its early stages in order to see the results.

Dr. Strecker states that the AIDS virus could not be naturally born and that were virologists who worked in the creation of an organism that could exert selective influence in the way the human body fights infection. The possibility was looked into that the virus impaired the immune system so that it could not respond once it made its way into the human body. According to the Strecker memo, the AIDS epidemic was triggered by the mass vaccination campaign that intended to end Smallpox.

The following is an exact transcription of the narrative in the Subcommittee of Appropriations held in July 1, 1969, which involved discussions about Synthetic Biological Agents.

There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and many eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 – 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.”

Mr. Sikes: Are we doing any work in that field?

Dr. MacArthur: We are not.

Mr. Sikes: Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?

Dr. MacArthur: Certainly not lack of interest.

Mr. Sikes: Would you provide for our record information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be, the time and the cost involved?

Dr. MacArthur: We will be very happy to. The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:

1. All biological agents up to the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.

2. Within the next 5 – 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.

3. A research program to explore the feasibility to this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a cost of $10 million.

As it has been documented, the World Health Organization used the Smallpox vaccine to spread the virus in Africa, Haiti, Brazil and Japan. After looking for documents to support the statement, it is clear that the spread of the virus coincides with how this plan was originally laid out. As an addendum, a confidential source in the WHO has revealed that there is “a strong correlation between the proportion of people in different central African countries who consented to the smallpox vaccine program and the proportion of those now infected with AIDS.

In the last fifteen years, the AIDS virus has killed 11 million Africans, which accounts for a total of 80 percent of the total world deaths due to the virus. According to numbers provided by the United Nations, at least 5000 funerals are held daily in Africa for people who die as a consequence of contracting the AIDS virus. Outdated numbers from 2001 show that in Latin America there were some 1.4 million people infected with AIDS, while South and South East Asia combined accounted for 5.8 million people. These numbers are rounded up in the Caribbean, where at least 700,000 people had been infected as of 2000.

Scientists like Dr. Strecker, suggest that the fact that most of AIDS’s victims reside in Africa and Latin America is not a coincidence, as only 2 percent of the affected population resides in Europe. Apparently, the goal of creating a bioweapon such as the AIDS virus was to eliminate a great part of the Africans in an effort to reduce global population to just about 500 hundred million, down from some 7 billion. An example that helps reinforce this thesis is the Tuskegee Experiment. Conducted between 1932 and 1972, the Tuskegee Experiment, recruited some 400 black Americans in an effort to test the effects of syphilis in Macon County, Alabama. The United States Health Services never gave the subjects any clear information of what exactly would be put into their bodies, ans instead were drawn to the testing centers with promises that the injection would help them treat or cure problems like Anemia, or “bad blood”.

More recently, pharmaceutical companies like Merck have been found liable for the death of thousands of people as a consequence of taking drugs such as VIOX. In the latest battle of the people versus the pharmaceutical industry, groups of people around the world, but more specifically in Texas rose to denounce Merck’s intent to make a new vaccine -Gardasil- available to young women between the ages of 8 and 11 years old in order to -according to Merck- help prevent the Human Papiloma Virus or HPV. Parent groups denounced the measure taken by Texas governor Rick Perry who signed a document saying it was the law to take the vaccine. It would later be leaked to the public that Gardasil contains a live cancer virus something produced in a laboratory, which caused several dozen girls to bleed uncontrollably during the term the injections were taken and even after completing the multiple doses. Mothers of the girls appeared in national radio talk shows to testify of their experience and that of their daughters’.

According to Boyd E. Graves, who has studied the origins of the HIV virus for years, the history of the disease goes back at least 100 years. “The United States began a significant effort to investigate “causes” of epidemic diseases. In 1887, the effort was enhanced with the mandate of the U.S. “LABORATORY OF HYGIENE”. This lab was run by Dr. Joseph J. Kinyoun, a deep rooted-racist, who served the eugenics movement with dedication. In 1893, we strengthened the Federal Quarantine Act and suddenly there was an explosion of polio.” On his website, Graves continues with a chronological account of the way how an grand eugenics program grew from scratch. ” In 1945, we witnessed the greatest influx of foreign scientists in history into the U.S. biological program. Operation Paperclip will live in infamy as one of the darkest programs of a twisted parallel government fixated on genocide. In 1946, the United States Navy hired Dr. Earl Traub, a notorious racist biologist. A May appropriations hearing confirms the existence of a “secret” biological weapon. In 1948, we know that the United States confirmed the endorsement of “devising a scheme” in which to address the issue of overpopulation in certain racial groups. State Department’s George McKennan’s memo will forever illuminate the eugenics mendacity necessary for genocide of millions of innocent people.” Programs like the one orchestrated to exterminate much or all of the black population are true for other diseases such as Cancer, Polio, Influenza, and more recently Bird Flu.

Another piece of evidence that reinforces the fact that HIV AIDS as well as other diseases are man-made and not naturally born is the 1971 special virus flow chart, obtained by Graves in 1999. The chart was sent to him on May 15th, 2000 by Dr. Victoria Cargill of the National Institutes of Health. The chart shows how scientists proceeded when experimenting with new viruses. As I have seen it, it is a step by step guide to be followed and the way decisions are made according to the results obtained in every stage of the experiments. The chart indicates how to go through the process of selecting a candidate, how to proceed in order to determine whether a subject has experienced any immunological response to the virus (HIV), to confirming the effectiveness of controlled methods for introductions in critical trails.

It is estimated that if the HIV virus is not stopped within the next three decades, it will indeed achieve the objective it was meant for; it will completely eradicate the black population in Africa and other regions of the world. What is more incredible is that African governments consented in 1974 in Bucarest Romania to the use of the HIV virus on the population. According to Dr. Graves, there are at least 15,000 progress reports filed regarding the experiments with the HIV virus and the US government along with other European counterparts have spent $550 million dollars in the creation and spread of the HIV AIDS virus.

Consulted Materials include:

1. House of Numbers. Brent W. Leung

1. End Game: Blueprint for Global Enslavement. Alex E. Jones

2. “The Strecker Memorandum.” Distributed by The Strecker Group, Eagle Rock, CA., 1983.

3. “AIDS: United States Germs Warfare at its Best with Documents and Proof”. Jack Felder. 1989

4. “Who Murdered Africa.” William Campbell Douglas. M.D. 

5. “AIDS is Biological Warfare.” Tom Bearden.

6. “Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus.”

7. “AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry Into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic.” Alan Cantwell.

8. “HIV infections up in Caribbean. The Plain Dealer.” 2000

Vacina contra H1N1 contém Virus Vivo, Esqualeno e Adjuvantes

Adjuvantes aceleram ação da vacina e causam reações imunológicas mortais.  Descrição da vacina diz que a mesma provoca efeitos neurológicos colaterais

Por Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
Maio 1, 2010

Como tem sido abundantemente comprovado, mercúrio e seus derivados são responsáveis pelo autismo em crianças emuitas outras doenças neurológicas, como a Síndrome da Guerra do Golfo. Mercúrio em sua forma mais comum de timerosal é colocado em quase todas as vacinas disponibilizadas ao público, normalmente como conservante. Como foi recentemente revelado pelo jornal Washington Post, muitas doses da nova vacina H1N1 serao armazenada em frascos de dose múltipla, que irao conter timerosal. Dados do Departamento de Educação relacionadas com estudos de 1992 e 1993 que foram comparados a dados de 2000 a 2001, revelam que o autismo tem aumentado em 644% entre as crianças nos E.U. Ao mesmo tempo, a Agencia de Alimentos e Drogas dos Estados Unidos (FDA) nunca exigiu às empresas farmacêuticas realizar testes de funcionamento. De acordo com Boyd Haley, o presidente do Departamento de Química da Universidade de Kentucky, o mercúrio é responsável por danos à mitocôndria.

Depóis de ler a transcrição e assistir o relatório onde o Dr. David Spencer, chefe do Centro de Control de Doencas (CDC), durante a crise da gripe de 1976 confessou que a vacina da gripe suína não foi testada antes de ser usada em 46 milhões de pessoas, agora tenho outra preocupação em relação à nova vacina contra H1N1. Foi confirmado que a nova vacina vai conter mercúrio e ingredientes derivados.

Devido ao uso de timerosal nas vacinas dadas às crianças, o número de casos de autismo aumentou em 1.500 por cento desde 1991. Este número corresponde ao período de tempo durante o qual o número de vacinas para crianças também aumentaram. Enquanto em 1991 havia uma criança com diagnóstico de autismo por cada 2500, hoje existem 166 crianças diagnosticadas para o 2500 mesmo. Estes números, bem como a pressão pública para interromper o uso de mercúrio em vacinas, obrigou algumas empresas para supostamente reduzir as quantidades de timerosal usado em seus produtos. Digo supostamente, porque, apesar de muitos médicos e outros profissionais de saúde assegurar às pessoas que a vacina é livre de mercúrio, esqualeno e adjuvantes, a verdade é que as descrições das vacinas páginas (Novartis 11-14) não só confirmam a utilização desses ingredientes, mas também confirmam que as vacinas não foram devidamente testadas (Sanofi Pasteur), a fim de conhecer os seus efeitos nas mulheres grávidas, crianças e jovens. Esses três grupos são os mesmos que o governo e as empresas pharmaceuticas tem como alvo nas campanhas de vacinação.

Enquanto o Center for Disease Control (CDC), a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) e outras agências continuam empurrando vacinas que contém mercúrio e outros produtos farmacêuticos como forma de prevenir e curar a doença, o Departamento de Defesa dos Estados Unidos reconhece os perigos do mercúrio. “O mercúrio é um material perigoso, que pode causar a morte se ingerido, inalado ou absorvido através da pele.” Entretanto, a Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), limitou as emissões de mercúrio na produção industrial, porque pode danificar o cérebro e sistema nervoso e é especialmente perigoso em fetos e crianças pequenas. As pessoas não pensariam que o mercúrio é perigoso ou que as vacinas são prejudiciais ao assistir os noticiários. Isso é porque ha uma campanha para tentar covencer as pessoas de que o mercúrio é bom e para fabricar a creenca que as vacinas sao ainda melhor. Há alegações nos meios de comunicação que querem fazer-nos pensar o mercúrio é maravilhoso para as crianças. E quando tal crença não funciona, nunca falta propaganda que diga que as criancas são ruins para o mundo.

Embora existam estudos independientes que provam que a ingestao de mercúrio tem consequências perigosas para o corpo humano, as empresas farmacêuticas continuam a rejeitá-los e dizem que as quantidades de mercúrio nas vacinas são seguras para ser injetadas na corrente sanguínea. Entre as conseqüências derivadas da ingestao de mercúrio de acordo com um estudo Ruso de 1977 estao dano cerebral, necrose tubular e lesão do sistema nervoso, incluindo obnubilação, coma e morte. Os epidemiologistas Tom Verstraeten e Dr. Richard Johnston, pediatra e imunologista da Universidade do Colorado, concluíram que o timerosal foi responsável pelo aumento dramático nos casos de autismo, mas seus resultados foram demitidos pela CDC. Rússia proibiu o timerosal das vacinas das crianças em 1980. Dinamarca, Áustria, Japão, Grã-Bretanha e todos os países escandinavos também proibiram o preservativo.

Em 1948, Randolph Byers e Frederick Moll, da Harvard Medical School e da Federal Drug Administration, realizaram testes com vacinas DPT no Hospital Infantil de Boston e concluiram que graves problemas neurológicos poderiam seguir da administração de vacinas DPT. Os resultados dos ensaios foram publicados na revista Pediatria. Segundo o testemunho do secretário adjunto de Saúde, Edward Grant, Jr., diante de uma Comissão do Senado nos E.U. no dia 3 de maio de 1985, a cada ano, 35.000 crianças sofrem danos neurológicos relacionados com a vacina DTP. Uma figura ainda mais recentes sobre a reação à vacina DTP indica que 1 em cada 100 crianças reagem com convulsões ou colapso ou agudos e que uma em cada 3 destes, que é de 1 em cada 300 permanece permanentemente danificados . Para obter mais informações, leia o Treatise Alex Logia sobre “Vacinação”

Assim, mais uma vez, centenas de milhares, senão milhões de pessoas servirão como ratos de laboratório para testar uma vacina que provavelmente não funciona. Ambas as companhias farmacêuticas e agências de saúde ainda não sabem como fazer uma vacina que seguramente vai lutar contra o vírus sem prejudicar o público. Estima-se que cerca de 12.000 crianças nos E.U. serao injetados com mercúrio quando estes sejam vacinados contra a gripe H1N1. Os preparativos estão sendo feitos para a realização de campanhas de vacinação forçada, para inocular em massa milhões de pessoas em todo o mundo.

Então o que devemos fazer em relação a nova vacina? Nós certamente não podemos confiar no governo ou nas agências do governo que nunca conseguiram nos manter saudaveis com os seus produtos químicos e outras ameaças como fluoreto de sódio na água potavel. Na verdade, os governos patrocinam muitos dos programas que matam pessoas. Além disso, as empresas farmacêuticas estão imunes a uma ação judicial por parte dos consumidores pois os paises que usam as vacinas assinaram um documento que mantém as grandes empresas farmaceuticas livres de culpa se qualquer pessona fica doente o morre depois de ser vacinado.

Esteja ciente não há nenhuma lei ou qualquer mandato que obrigue voce a tomar vacinas. Portanto, nenhum servidor público ou privado, deve obrigar a tomar uma vacina ou um produto farmacêutico. Há renúncias que um pai pode usar para evitar tomar vacinas, o que também pode ser usado para impedir que os seus filhos sejam injetados na escola. A recomendação feita por muitos médicos, cientistas e enfermeiros que reconhecem os perigos das vacinas e mercúrio como um ingrediente em si é não tomar a vacina até que seja comprovado de forma independente que esta é segura. Outro passo que você pode tomar para manter-se e aos seus filhos a salvo de mercúrio e outras substâncias químicas contidas em vacinas e medicamentos, é melhorando as chances de se manter saudável, é o de melhorar o seu sistema imunológico com produtos naturais como o óleo de orégano, vitamina D3, água sem floreto de sódio assim como frutas e vegetais orgânicos.

Fontes de informacao:

Vacinas, Neurodesenvolvimento e Transtornos do Espectro do Autismohttp://web.mac.com/rblaylock/Russell_Blaylock_M.D./Articles/Entries/2008/3/12_Vaccines%2C_Neurodevelopment_and_Autism_Spectrum_Disorders.html

1. O objetivo de cada vacina H1N1 é Imunotoxicidade, neurotoxicidade e esterilidade
http://preventdisease.com/news/09/103009_vaccine_sterility_immunotoxicity_neurotoxicity.shtml

2. Novo estudo implica Mercúrio no desenvolvimento do autismo
http://stanford.wellsphere.com/autism-autism-spectrum-article/new-study-implicates-mercury-in-the-development-of-autism/202357

3. Vacinas, Autismo e Síndrome da Guerra do Golfo
http://www.rense.com/general67/vacc.htm

4. Washington Post: vacina contra gripe suína contém mercúrio
http://nationalexpositor.com/News/1603.html

5. CBS 60 Minutes: 1976 Propaganda para favorecer vacinacao contra gripe suína
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ro1WL5ketWg

6. CBS K-EYE Mercúrio e bom para voce
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZArebYZzdc

7. Crianças são ruins para o planeta?
http://www.sodahead.com/living/having-kids-is-bad-for-the-planet/question-249304/

8. Fatos científicos sobre Mercúrio
http://www.greenfacts.org/en/mercury/l-2/mercury-2.htm

9. Mercúrio, vacinas, autismo e a saúde do seu filho
http://www.naturalnews.com/011764.html

10. Painel cria lista de grupos para vacinar a populacao
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/29/AR2009072903607_2.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter&sid=ST2009072903827

11. Wal-Mart quer ser centro de vacinacao
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE56T4I220090730

12. University of Alabama Implementa Programa de Vacinação Obrigatória
http://www.republicmedia.tv/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3556:university-of-alabama-implements-mandatory-vaccination-program&catid=42:national-headlines&Itemid=53

13. Empresas que fabricam a vacina contra a gripe suína obtem imunidade
http://southeastern-massachusetts.injuryboard.com/fda-and-prescription-drugs/swine-flu-vaccine-makers-get-immunity-.aspx?googleid=267416

14. Experimentação médica nos humanos: A história chocante sobre a verdade da medicina moderna e psiquiatria (1833-1965)
http://www.naturalnews.com/019189.html

15. Associação Nacional de Autismo. O que provoca o autismo
http://www.nationalautismassociation.org/thimerosal.php

16. Boyd Haley comentários sobre o autismo e timerosal
http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2008/03/boyd-haley-comments-on-thimerosal-and.html