Cowardly World Leaders Hide from the Public

Barack Obama changes G8 Summit Location from Chicago to Camp David

Associated Press
March 5, 2012

The White House abruptly announced Monday that it had scuttled plans to hold the upcoming G-8 economic summit in Chicago, and would instead host world leaders at the presidential retreat at Camp David in Maryland.

It was an unusually late location change for a large and highly scripted international summit and came with little explanation from the White House. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel — the former White House chief of staff who personally lobbied President Barack Obama to hold the summit in Chicago — was informed only hours before the official announcement.

White House national security spokesman Tommy Vietor simply said that Camp David, the rustic retreat in the mountains of Maryland, was a setting that would allow for more intimate discussions among the G-8 leaders. He said security and the possibility of protests were not factors in the decision, noting that Obama would still host the NATO summit in his hometown of Chicago from May 20-21.

The White House said the G-8 summit would take place May 18-19.

The White House announced plans last summer to hold both summits back-to-back in Chicago, giving the president a high-profile opportunity to tout his foreign policy and diplomatic credentials on his home turf in an election year.

The idea of moving the G-8 to Camp David was raised to the president a few weeks ago, a senior administration official said, adding that the president was intrigued by the novelty of the idea and asked staff whether they could pull off the change.

The official who spoke on condition of anonymity about internal White House thinking.

Adding to the curious nature of the White House announcement was the fact that Obama rarely spends time at his presidential retreat. And unlike many of his predecessors, Obama has never hosted a world leader at Camp David.

Monday’s announcement appeared to catch many in Chicago by surprise.

A spokeswoman for Emanuel said the Chicago mayor was informed about the location change in a Monday phone call from a White House official.

Chris Johnson, spokesman for the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, said his organization was “just as surprised about the announcement as anybody else.”

The world’s eight largest economies are represented in the G-8 and hosting duties for the annual summit are rotated among the member countries. The summits have become a target for large, and sometimes violent, protests in recent years, making security costs a concern for host cities.

At least one protest group heralded the news as a major victory. But Joe Iosbaker of the United National Antiwar Committee in Chicago said protests would still go on during the NATO summit.

Chicago officials began planning for the summits last summer, with city officials predicting it would give the city a chance to shine internationally, while the police rank-and-file worryied whether they would be prepared to handle the thousands of protesters expected to converge downtown.

Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Obama’s senior director for European affairs, said recently that the president was confident his hometown could put on a “great show” and that its police department was up to the task of providing security.

The city’s host committee had estimated it could cost $40 million to $65 million to stage the events, including the costs for security.

Gordon Johndroe, who served as National Security Council spokesman for President George W. Bush, said the immense logistics involved in setting up an international gathering like the G-8 would make it difficult to split the summits at such a late date.

“It is very complicated to set these things up, and even more complicated to move them that quickly,” said Johndroe.

Leaders from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom, as well as the European Union, are expected to attend this year’s gathering.

Buques Iranís Atraviesan el Canal de Suez

El pasaje de las naves es el primero desde la revolución islámica en la antigua Persia en el año 1979

Terra.es

Dos buques de la Armada iraní han entrado este martes en el Canal de Suez y se dirigen hacia el mar Mediterráneo, ha informado un responsable del canal, una maniobra que probablemente irritará a Israel. ‘Entraron en el canal a las 05.45 hora local’, ha indicado el funcionario. No hubo más detalles disponibles.

El canal de Suez atraviesa Egipto y permite a las embarcaciones pasar de Oriente Próximo a Europa y viceversa sin tener que dar toda la vuelta a África. Su boca norte, Port Said, está a unos 100 kilómetros de Israel, pero la ruta de los barcos -que se dirigen a Siria- les llevaría en paralelo a la costa israelí. Se trata de una fragata y un buque de aprovisionamieto.

El primer ministro israelí, Benjamin Netanyahu, ha dicho anteriormente que vería ‘con gravedad’ el paso de las naves, las primeras que atraviesan el canal desde la revolución islámica en la antigua Persia en 1979.

Irán parece estar poniendo a prueba la situación en Oriente Próximo tras la caída del presidente egipcio, Hosni Mubarak. Egipto es uno de los pocos países árabes que tiene un tratado de paz con Israel, por lo que resulta decisivo para el Estado judío, que además está nervioso por la inestabilidad política en su vecino del este y en otros países árabes aliados de Estados Unidos.

Las encuestas en Egipto sugieren que la mayoría de las principales fuerzas políticas serían menos complacientes con Israel y EEUU de lo que ha sido Mubarak, aunque ningún grupo ha pedido la derogación de los acuerdos de paz de Camp David de 1979.

Los nuevos dirigentes militares, ante su primer dolor de cabeza diplomático desde que se hicieron cargo del poder el 11 de febrero, aprobaron el paso de los buques por el canal, una ruta comercial mundial decisiva y fuente de ingresos vital para las autoridades.

La caída y el debilitamiento de dirigentes considerados amigos de Estados Unidos envalentonará probablemente a Irán, según analistas, y disminuiría la posibilidad de que haga concesiones sobre su programa nuclear. Teherán niega que pretenda construir armas atómicas.