U.S. Terrorising Through Proxy Governments

Obama Asks Saudis to send weapons to Libya to equip rebel groups

The Independent
March 7, 2011

Desperate to avoid US military involvement in Libya in the event of a prolonged struggle between the Gaddafi regime and its opponents, the Americans have asked Saudi Arabia if it can supply weapons to the rebels in Benghazi. The Saudi Kingdom, already facing a “day of rage” from its 10 per cent Shia Muslim community on Friday, with a ban on all demonstrations, has so far failed to respond to Washington’s highly classified request, although King Abdullah personally loathes the Libyan leader, who tried to assassinate him just over a year ago.

Washington’s request is in line with other US military co-operation with the Saudis. The royal family in Jeddah, which was deeply involved in the Contra scandal during the Reagan administration, gave immediate support to American efforts to arm guerrillas fighting the Soviet army in Afghanistan in 1980 and later – to America’s chagrin – also funded and armed the Taliban.

But the Saudis remain the only US Arab ally strategically placed and capable of furnishing weapons to the guerrillas of Libya. Their assistance would allow Washington to disclaim any military involvement in the supply chain – even though the arms would be American and paid for by the Saudis.

The Saudis have been told that opponents of Gaddafi need anti-tank rockets and mortars as a first priority to hold off attacks by Gaddafi’s armour, and ground-to-air missiles to shoot down his fighter-bombers.

Supplies could reach Benghazi within 48 hours but they would need to be delivered to air bases in Libya or to Benghazi airport. If the guerrillas can then go on to the offensive and assault Gaddafi’s strongholds in western Libya, the political pressure on America and Nato – not least from Republican members of Congress – to establish a no-fly zone would be reduced.

US military planners have already made it clear that a zone of this kind would necessitate US air attacks on Libya’s functioning, if seriously depleted, anti-aircraft missile bases, thus bringing Washington directly into the war on the side of Gaddafi’s opponents.

For several days now, US Awacs surveillance aircraft have been flying around Libya, making constant contact with Malta air traffic control and requesting details of Libyan flight patterns, including journeys made in the past 48 hours by Gaddafi’s private jet which flew to Jordan and back to Libya just before the weekend.

Officially, Nato will only describe the presence of American Awacs planes as part of its post-9/11 Operation Active Endeavour, which has broad reach to undertake aerial counter-terrorism measures in the Middle East region.

The data from the Awacs is streamed to all Nato countries under the mission’s existing mandate. Now that Gaddafi has been reinstated as a super-terrorist in the West’s lexicon, however, the Nato mission can easily be used to search for targets of opportunity in Libya if active military operations are undertaken.

Al Jazeera English television channel last night broadcast recordings made by American aircraft to Maltese air traffic control, requesting information about Libyan flights, especially that of Gaddafi’s jet.

An American Awacs aircraft, tail number LX-N90442 could be heard contacting the Malta control tower on Saturday for information about a Libyan Dassault-Falcon 900 jet 5A-DCN on its way from Amman to Mitiga, Gaddafi’s own VIP airport.

Nato Awacs 07 is heard to say: “Do you have information on an aircraft with the Squawk 2017 position about 85 miles east of our [sic]?”

Malta air traffic control replies: “Seven, that sounds to be Falcon 900- at flight level 340, with a destination Mitiga, according to flight plan.”

But Saudi Arabia is already facing dangers from a co-ordinated day of protest by its own Shia Muslim citizens who, emboldened by the Shia uprising in the neighbouring island of Bahrain, have called for street protests against the ruling family of al-Saud on Friday.

After pouring troops and security police into the province of Qatif last week, the Saudis announced a nationwide ban on all public demonstrations.

Shia organisers claim that up to 20,000 protesters plan to demonstrate with women in the front rows to prevent the Saudi army from opening fire.

If the Saudi government accedes to America’s request to send guns and missiles to Libyan rebels, however, it would be almost impossible for President Barack Obama to condemn the kingdom for any violence against the Shias of the north-east provinces.

Thus has the Arab awakening, the demand for democracy in North Africa, the Shia revolt and the rising against Gaddafi become entangled in the space of just a few hours with US military priorities in the region.

About Luis Miranda
The Real Agenda is an independent publication. It does not take money from Corporations, Foundations or Non-Governmental Organizations. It provides news reports in three languages: English, Spanish and Portuguese to reach a larger group of readers. Our news are not guided by any ideological, political or religious interest, which allows us to keep our integrity towards the readers.

2 Responses to U.S. Terrorising Through Proxy Governments

  1. S. Strauch says:

    You interpret helping the Libyan rebels as terrorism by proxy? I am no friend of the US, but if for once they do something right (even it is to further their own interest, which it always is), I don’t think we should dismiss it as terrorism by proxy.

    • News Desk says:

      They are not helping the Libyan people. You need to understand the language the war mongers use and to interpret it. Helping people in need due to disasters, disease or other excuses usually means international forces going into a country or region to steal the resources and install a puppet government -provided the war mongers do not have one already in place. Are you familiar with Kosovo 1998, Iran in 1980, Iraq 1991, Iraq 2003, Panama 1970’s-80’s, Nicaragua, Colombia, Egypt, Mexico, Libya itself and so on.

      All of them have something in common. They all were bombarded with artillery loaded with depleted uranium coming from NATO and US forces. They will die horrific deaths and their offspring will be born with physical and other impairments for at least two generations. That is not an example of helping.

      If you read the text with attention, you’ll discover I mentioned how U.S. special forces are on the ground in Libya conducting rebel activity to overthrow the dictator there -who I do not sympathize with.

      There is no such as thing as humanitarian aid, or military action on behalf of oppressed people when such aid is delivered by the war mongers that spur religious, ethnic and other kinds of conflict.

      The solution for all local and regional conflict must come from the people, not outside forces. It does not take days for that to happen, but months and years.

      What is your definition of a foreign army coming into your country and aiding a determined group in order to overthrow your leader? Is it not that an example of terrorism by proxy? Is it not that what the UK, the US, France, Italy, Israel and other industrialized powers have done through history? For you to think the globalists in control of those nations have any interest in aiding the poor or oppressed is simply foolish.

      If I may, I would like to provide two articles that put this situation in context. The first, presents a historical reference and can be found here: http://real-agenda.com/2011/02/05/the-revolution-the-globalists-yearned-for/

      The second has a more updated version and can be read here: http://real-agenda.com/2011/02/25/whats-happening-in-the-middle-east/

      For a detailed look into how the media portrays war as a good thing to help the oppressed, see the article here: http://real-agenda.com/2011/03/02/an-empire-of-lies-the-cia-and-the-western-media/

%d bloggers like this: